My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0272.003 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2012-2014
>
COM 0272.003 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:03:12 PM
Creation date
3/13/2014 10:19:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2012-2014
Communication
0272
Point
003
Author
Lane Shibata, Acting Legislative Auditor
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
FC: Postponed Comm. 272.3 to March 31, 2014 - 3/18/14. FC: Close file - 3/31/14.
Document Relationships
AGE FC 2014/03/18 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Finance Committee (FC)
AGE FC 2014/03/31 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County of Hawaii— Office of County Clerk and Office of Elections <br /> Agreed Upon Procedures Report <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> i. Condition: Overtime descriptions were not obtained for temporary clerks hired <br /> through the temporary staffing agency during the 2012 election cycle. The <br /> temporary clerks' timesheets did not include a description of overtime work <br /> performed. Consequently the County may not have captured some of the costs <br /> that could have been reimbursed by the State. <br /> Recommendation: Prior to the 2012 election cycle, temporary clerks completed <br /> a daily supplemental timesheet. This timesheet categorized the work by <br /> reimbursable cost center and cost code and was entered into the Election <br /> Division's Microsoft Access Timekeeping Program on a weekly basis. The <br /> Timekeeping Program summarized the overtime and created the reimbursable <br /> overtime schedule submitted to the State Office of Elections. This procedure <br /> should be reinstated. <br /> ii. Condition: During the 2012 election cycle, overtime descriptions for Council <br /> Services employees performing Election Division related overtime were not <br /> detailed enough to determine if the tasks were eligible for State of Hawaii Office <br /> of Elections reimbursement. Consequently the County may not have captured all <br /> costs that could have been reimbursed by the State. <br /> Recommendation: Council Services employees should complete a daily <br /> supplemental timesheet with adequate detailed descriptions for overtime to allow <br /> for the categorization of work by reimbursable cost center and cost code. <br /> 6. County Clerk-Office of Council Services Overtime Salaries and Wages Incurred for Elections <br /> Division Work/Tasks for the 2012 Election Cycle: <br /> a. We agreed all County Clerk — Office of Council Services overtime salaries and wages <br /> transactions from the 2012 election cycle to an authorized time sheet and identified the <br /> reasons noted on the timesheet for overtime hours. <br /> b. We evaluated the timesheets to determine if work performed by the County Clerk— Office <br /> of Council Services was related to Elections Division tasks. There were 1,566 overtime <br /> transactions, 900 of those transactions had exceptions or were on timesheets with <br /> Election Division task related. The schedule of Office of Council Services overtime <br /> salaries and wages is attached to this report as Exhibit J. Our summarized procedural <br /> finding and recommendations are as follows: <br /> i. Condition: There were two timesheets with date discrepancies between the <br /> overtime description support and the Eden payroll report (See Exhibit J: Agree <br /> Overtime Exception a). <br /> Recommendation: Keypunched dates should be verified against timesheet <br /> dates. <br /> ii. Condition: There was a timesheet that indicated 7 hours of overtime. However, <br /> the employee was paid 4 hours of overtime. The difference of 3 hours was paid <br /> to the employee in a subsequent pay period (See Exhibit J: Agree Overtime <br /> Exception b). There were four timesheets that included overtime hours that did <br /> not appear on the Eden report. The hours were not paid in subsequent periods. <br /> (See Exhibit J: Agree Overtime Exception f). <br /> Recommendation: Keypunched hours should be verified against timesheet <br /> hours. <br /> iii. Condition: An employee's original authorized timesheet was not available for a <br /> pay period. An unsigned, unauthorized photocopy of the timesheet was used as <br /> support. (See Exhibit J: Agree Overtime Exception c). <br /> Recommendation: Original signed timesheets should be filed immediately after <br /> they are returned from the payroll department. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.