My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0272.003 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2012-2014
>
COM 0272.003 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:03:12 PM
Creation date
3/13/2014 10:19:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2012-2014
Communication
0272
Point
003
Author
Lane Shibata, Acting Legislative Auditor
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
FC: Postponed Comm. 272.3 to March 31, 2014 - 3/18/14. FC: Close file - 3/31/14.
Document Relationships
AGE FC 2014/03/18 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Finance Committee (FC)
AGE FC 2014/03/31 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County of Hawaii—Office of County Clerk and Office of Elections <br /> Agreed Upon Procedures Report <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br /> iv. Condition: There were no overtime descriptions on 25 timesheets or timesheet <br /> attachments. (See Exhibit J: Agree Overtime Exception d). <br /> Recommendation: Supervisors should ensure that there are adequate <br /> descriptions for overtime hours before approving timesheets. <br /> v. Condition: The total overtime hours in the overtime description of three <br /> timesheets did not agree with the total overtime hours on the payroll report. The <br /> employee did not fill out the timesheet according to the new instructions and the <br /> Accountant I at the time did not know the former procedure to realize that the <br /> employee was completing the timesheet incorrectly. (See Exhibit J: Agree <br /> Overtime Exception e). <br /> Recommendation: We recommend that management update the payroll <br /> procedures manual as soon as procedural changes are implemented and notify <br /> all employees of such changes. <br /> vi. Condition: The hour code was incorrectly entered into the Eden report for one <br /> of the timesheets. The correction was made in the subsequent pay period. <br /> (Exhibit J: Agree Overtime Exception g). <br /> Recommendation: Keypunched hour codes should be verified against timesheet <br /> details. <br /> vii. Condition: Payroll Expenditure Adjustments were not consistently made for <br /> Council Services employees that were temporarily assigned to the Election <br /> Division. The TIH Comment column in Exhibit J identifies expenditures that <br /> should have been included in a Payroll Expenditure Adjustment to increase the <br /> Election Division salaries and wages and decrease Council Services salaries and <br /> wages. The total payroll expenditures not adjusted are included in Exhibit K. <br /> Recommendation: The County of Hawaii should consistently adjust all payroll <br /> expenditures for Council Services employees that are temporarily assigned to the <br /> Election Division. <br /> c. We summarized the overtime incurred by the County Clerk — Office of Council Services <br /> personnel related to Elections Division tasks. The summarized schedule is attached to <br /> this report as Exhibit K. <br /> 7. Cost per ballot cast in each election cycle. <br /> a. We added the total Office of the County Clerk-Council Services salaries and wages <br /> amount determined from Procedure 6 to the total COH Elections Division payroll and <br /> non-payroll expenditures for election cycle 2012. <br /> b. We calculated the total COH elections cost per ballot cast for election cycles 2012, 2010 <br /> and 2008. Our calculations are attached to this report as Exhibit L. <br /> 8. Reimbursement of actual travel expenditures versus set per diem travel expenditures. <br /> a. We identified all 2012 election cycle travel expenditures vouched during Procedure 2a <br /> above in which the employee was reimbursed for actual travel expenditures incurred. <br /> b. We compared the actual travel expenditures incurred to established COH per diem <br /> amounts to determine whether reimbursement under the established per diem policy <br /> would have been less. There were 3 expenditures for meals based on the actual amount <br /> as opposed to the per diem amount. In one case the actual amount was less than the <br /> per diem. The actual cost of the other two expenditures exceeded the per diem <br /> by$14.93 (See Exhibit D exception V.7). <br /> 9. General Recommendations <br /> Based on our findings related to the 2012 election cycle, we submit the following for your <br /> consideration: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.