My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0024.018 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2012-2014
>
COM 0024.018 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2014 11:12:08 AM
Creation date
4/21/2014 12:21:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2012-2014
Communication
0024
Point
018
Author
Dennis "Fresh" Onishi, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
FC: Withdrawn by Author (Mr. Onishi) - 4/30/2014.
Document Relationships
AGE FC 2014/04/30 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• To define the type of data that would be required to employ the <br /> income approach from the market's point of view they would not <br /> necessarily have to get current rent rolls as that are simply a <br /> record of the individual property owners <br /> • Contract rents are not market rents <br /> • Somebody could be a long-term tenant there and give them fifty <br /> percent (50%) rates and what are you going to do with that? <br /> Not a whole lot <br /> • So they would not have to collect things like contract rents <br /> • They could develop the average expenses for a particular <br /> property type <br /> • They could go to the market and do rent surveys and find out <br /> what the market is paying at a given valuation time then identify <br /> that type of data and define a system <br /> • That is something that has not been done before <br /> • They have got some experience in terms of what would be <br /> required but I think the starting point would be to define what it <br /> is that would be the drivers on and the units of measure, <br /> whether it is revenue per room or something else. <br /> • It could work without a whole lot of additional expense if they <br /> targeted the right kind of specific information for each property <br /> type and then began the collection process and made it work <br /> • That would balance the see-saw a whole lot and it would be a <br /> much fairer way <br /> • For income producing properties, while they consider the cost <br /> approach and sales comparison approach there is so little data <br /> • Eighty-one sales in five years, how are they going to get precise <br /> in terms of valuation? It's a throw away <br /> • They go through it because they are required to by USPAP or <br /> whatever <br /> • Thinks it is a very doable thing and as a committee member, <br /> welcomes their definition of the key elements of data that they <br /> would need to drive this system <br /> • Perhaps recommendations on what additional costs that would <br /> impose <br /> • It is a new system although it may, if they switch to reliance on <br /> the income approach where appropriate and do not do as much <br /> work on the sales collection data and the cost approach which <br /> are staple but to be aware of the improvements made by an <br /> owner <br /> • When a hotel built in 1976 or 1967 gets refurbished, that kind of <br /> information about the physical condition, marketability, etc , is <br /> important too <br /> • Thinks definition of the key piece of information they would need <br /> is an estimate of what the additional cost there might be as <br /> there will be some savings too if these property types were to <br /> shift from the method used before to a reliance on what they <br /> - 0 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.