My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0024.018 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2012-2014
>
COM 0024.018 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2014 11:12:08 AM
Creation date
4/21/2014 12:21:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2012-2014
Communication
0024
Point
018
Author
Dennis "Fresh" Onishi, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
FC: Withdrawn by Author (Mr. Onishi) - 4/30/2014.
Document Relationships
AGE FC 2014/04/30 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
should be driven by, the income approach, then the division <br /> could get it done <br /> • It would be painless and it would score a mayor point for <br /> fairness, clarity and appropriateness of valuation systems <br /> • Would be delighted if they can further that kind of objective <br /> process here <br /> Ms Wille announced <br /> • They should think about what things that they would want to go <br /> over now or what things they would want the division to report <br /> back at the next meeting so that the members will be ahead <br /> o Mr Onishi stated <br /> • His understanding is, and also with the Task Force Members, <br /> that they want to look at the income approach <br /> • As Mr Sitko and Mrs Crawford mentioned, a change to the <br /> code is needed <br /> • Will need to get a proposal to the Council to change the code <br /> • After that, as the budget will be coming up in the next few <br /> months, a possibility would be to recommend getting some <br /> funds to the Finance Department to possibly contract some of <br /> the work so it gets done faster. <br /> • Mr. Sitko's saying they are shorthanded, that there is only one <br /> person <br /> • They should start looking and moving in that direction and trying <br /> to see how much funds are needed because if all the members <br /> agree that this is what they would want to do, then they should <br /> work with the department to have them get that proposal to the <br /> committee so the members can look it over <br /> • Then it can be submitted, after the Finance Department gets the <br /> committee's approval, to the Council for the budget <br /> c Mr Inoue questioned Mr Sitko if he knew if Maui County, Kauai <br /> County or Honolulu County uses the income approach <br /> Mr Sitko responded that all four counties at this point do not use it <br /> Mr Hussey questioned if they were using it or not <br /> Mr Sitko responded <br /> • All four counties are not using it except for defense work <br /> • Understood from the history that this comes down to the way <br /> the ordinance was written and a decision by Judge Chang who <br /> is in charge of Tax Appeal Court <br /> c Mr Hussey questioned if Mr Sitko would anticipate a judicial challenge <br /> if they were to recommend what is the obvious <br /> Mr Sitko responded <br /> • No because basically each County has the right to do what it <br /> needs to do as far as real property taxes are concerned <br /> • The limitation is because it specifically mentions that they use <br /> the market and costs in the County's ordinances and they did <br /> not include the word 'income or that approach <br /> - 10 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.