My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 499 Draft 01 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2012-2014
>
RES 499 Draft 01 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 1:05:14 PM
Creation date
8/25/2014 11:11:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2012-2014
Bill/Resolution
499
Draft
01
Introducer
Brenda J. Ford, Council Member
Referred To
GREDC
Action 1
GREDC-8 negative recommendation - 09/16/14.
Action 2
Council: Res. 499-14 filed due to vote count - 10/01/14
Status
Filed
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
10/1/2014
Ayes
1-Ford
Noes
6-Eoff;Ilagan;Kern;Poindexter;Wille;Yoshimoto
Absent
2-Kanuha;Onishi
Excused
0
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2014/10/01 2012-2014
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Council
AGE GREDC 2014/09/16 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Governmental Relations & Economic Development Committee (GREDC)
COM 0996.000 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2012-2014
REP GREDC 008 2014/09/16 (2012-2014)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2012-2014\Governmental Relations & Economic Development Committee (GREDC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
devastated many areas of Puna and also causing damage in parts of Ka`u. This resulted in the <br />closure of two precincts in Puna on Primary Election Day and disenfranchisement of many of the <br />voters in Puna who could not get to the polls on August 9, 2014. A "make-up" election was then <br />held in only one location on Friday, August 15, 2014, even though the district of Puna was still <br />in survival mode, many people could still not get out of their neighborhoods, and only voters in <br />the two precincts that were closed on August 9, 2014, were allowed to vote. This led to many <br />complaints of disenfranchisement; and <br />WHEREAS, the County of Maui was reported to have "mislaid" 800 ballots that were <br />not counted until August 15, 2014; and <br />WHEREAS, the state of Oregon has conducted Vote By Mail elections since 1998. The <br />2004 Oregon election was one of the most contentious and closely scrutinized elections in <br />Oregon history, and Oregon had the third highest voter turnout in the nation at 86.48% of <br />registered voters. Oregon was the only state without same-day voter registration to place in the <br />top five for voter turnout, and among states where same-day voter registration is not allowed, <br />Oregon had the highest voter turnout. The elections ran smoothly, with no improper counting, <br />no voter suppression or intimidation, and no mismanagement. Fears that Vote By Mail is <br />vulnerable to widespread fraud were again proven unfounded. It is very clear that Vote By Mail <br />is a successful, fraud -free, and voter -friendly model for an election administration. In 2008, <br />Oregon achieved 85.7% voter turnout; and <br />WHEREAS, Vote By Mail maximizes voter convenience because voters do not have to <br />stand in lines at the polls, abandon long lines at the precinct in frustration, take time off from <br />work, drive in bad weather to precincts, wait for their turn at a limited number of polling booths, <br />or miss the opportunity to vote on election day due to illness, personal emergency, or natural <br />disasters; and <br />WHEREAS, Vote By Mail reduces fears of fraud since the signature required to submit <br />a secret ballot can be verified to ensure that each voter is who he or she claims to be; and <br />WHEREAS, Vote By Mail improves accuracy of voter rolls because mailed ballots are <br />not forwarded by the United States Postal Service but instead are returned to the county office of <br />elections where voter rolls are kept and prevents risk of inappropriate purges; and <br />WHEREAS, Vote By Mail improves uniformity because there is centralized supervision <br />of ballot processing in the county office of elections, instead of in dispersed polling places. This <br />maintains uniformity and strict compliance with law; and <br />P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.