Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> AGENCIES COMMENTS <br /> <br /> 20. Land Use Commission (July 24, 1996): <br /> "We have reviewed the subject applications and supporting document, as transmitted <br /> by your memorandum dated July 17, 1996, and have the following cotnmen[s to <br /> offer: <br /> 1) We confirm that the subject parcel, identified as TMK: 7-3-08: 32, is within <br /> the State Land Use Agricultural District. <br /> 2) Based on the supporting documents for the subject applications, it is our <br /> understanding that the Applicant does not intend to construct any dwellings on <br /> the proposed lots, including the one or two lots that the Applicant will retain. <br /> However, it is also our understanding that the Applicant's intentions does not <br /> restrict the construction of residences by any other party upon conveyance of <br /> the remaining lots. <br /> Clarification is needed as to whether the Applicant intends in the future to <br /> construct a residential unit(s) on the parcel(s) that it retains. <br /> We have no further comments to offer at this time. <br /> If you have any questions in regards to this matter, please feel free to contact me or <br /> Leo Asuncion of my staff at 587-3822." <br /> Applicant's Response: (See Exhibit B -August 15, 1996 Letter) <br /> <br /> 21. b7re Department: (See Exhibit C -August 21, 1996 Memo) <br /> <br /> 22. Department of Water Supply: (See Exhibits Dand E -July 24, 1996 and August <br /> 12, 1996 Letters) <br /> <br /> 23. Real Property Tax Office (July 23, 1996 Memo): <br /> "Within the past ten yeazs, this property was assessed as pasture from 1987 to 1992. <br /> Section 19-53 (f)(92) of the Hawaii County Code states: "A deferred or roll back tax <br /> shall be imposed on the owner of agricultural lands assessed according to its <br /> agriculttral use provided in subsection (a) of this section in the event of a change in <br /> use classification by the authorized State agency to urban or rural districts or upon the <br /> subdivision of the land into parcels of five-acres or less..." The amount of rollback <br /> taxes due, including the 10% penalty, upon the rezoning of this parcel to rural would <br /> be approximately $10,500." <br /> Applicant's Response: (See Exhibit B -August 15, 1996 Letter) <br /> -3- <br /> <br />