My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0911.000 2014-2016
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2014-2016
>
COM 0911.000 2014-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2016 3:17:52 PM
Creation date
6/21/2016 12:16:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2014-2016
Communication
0911
Point
000
Author
William P. Kenoi, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
BIL 216 Draft 01 2014-2016
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2014-2016
REP PC 070 2016/07/07 (2014-2016)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2014-2016\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dru Kanuha, Council Chair <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> Page 6 <br /> Assuming an escrow company would handle the calculation and collection of <br /> payment, the Planning Department would need to train escrow company staff and verify <br /> their calculations are correct each time a unit/lot sells. It is also unclear who would pay <br /> any escrow company fees to administer the collection of fair share payments. The County <br /> does not have funds to pay an escrow company to administer the fair share program and <br /> does not have complex accounting software to track payments made through the escrow <br /> company to Planning. In addition, should the County Council adopt a Unified Impact <br /> Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for imposition of exactions of the assessment of <br /> impact fees, the escrow account would need to be closed and the remaining fees not paid <br /> converted to an impact fee. Finally, fair share funds are reported annually to the County <br /> Council and are appropriated by the departments for capital improvements. The escrow <br /> company would need to prepare regular reports to Planning Department staff who manage <br /> the Fair Share Annual Report and respond to requests for availability of funds for capital <br /> projects. <br /> The current fair share payment program is the most efficient way for the County to <br /> collect these payments with the minimum amount of staff time and resources. <br /> Implementing the requested change in fair share payment collection would require <br /> additional staff resources that would cost the County more money, but since the fair share <br /> payment amount would not increase, there would be no benefit to the County and its <br /> taxpayers who fund staff positions. For these reasons, the Planning Director strongly <br /> recommends forwarding an unfavorable recommendation to the County Council to amend <br /> Condition V. <br /> Based on the above findings, the Planning Director recommends that the Planning <br /> Commission for to the County Council a favorable recommendation to amend Conditions B <br /> and J and an unfavorable recommendation to amend Condition V of Ordinance No. 04-56. <br /> The accompanying draft bill reflecting the recommended amendments is provided for <br /> your consideration. In addition, the Planning Director recommends that existing conditions in <br /> the ordinance be revised to reflect the current standard language for conditions of approval and <br /> housekeeping revisions. (Material to be deleted is bracketed and struck through and material to <br /> be added is underscored). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.