My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0181.000 2016-2018
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2016-2018
>
COM 0181.000 2016-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2017 4:24:43 PM
Creation date
3/20/2017 9:03:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2016-2018
Communication
0181
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2017/04/19 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Council
AGE PC 2017/04/04 (2016-2018)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 022 Draft 01 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2016-2018
REP PC 010 2017/04/04 (2016-2018)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2016-2018\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Valerie T. Poindexter, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />Page 6 <br />coastline and will not be impacted by coastal hazard and beach erosion. As stated above, <br />the applicant has submitted a concurrent request for a Special Management Area (SMA) <br />Use Permit to allow for the proposed development. There are no identified recreational <br />resources, public access to the shoreline or mountain areas, scenic and open space <br />preserves, coastal ecosystems, marine resources or other natural and environmental <br />resources in immediate the area. Thus, the proposed request and use of the property will <br />not adversely impact those resources. It is not anticipated that endangered or threatened <br />candidate species of flora or fauna are located within the subject property because the <br />property was previously bulldozed, cleared and was developed and previously used as a <br />school site. Presently, there is no evidence of any traditional and customary Native <br />Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site. <br />Haun and Associates prepared an Archeological Assessment in association with <br />this application. The assessment was prepared for the 0.047 -acre, undeveloped portion of <br />the property located on the southeast side of a chain-link fence surrounding the majority <br />of the property. The report referenced a 1989 archeological study by William Barrera, Jr. <br />of Chinango, Inc. which was prepared for the Use Permit No. 72 to allow for a school. <br />Barrera conducted a reconnaissance survey of the project area which at that time was <br />classified as a portion of TMK: 6-8-001:052, which identified one site in the area, <br />described as a "crude shelter wall and several excavations into the pahoehoe (often <br />referred to as aboriginal scoria quarries)." These features were not mapped or described <br />and the site was not assigned a State Inventory of Historic Places (SIHP) site number. <br />Barrera recommended that the site be preserved and protected by a 15 -ft buffer and that a <br />chain-link fence be built where the buffer zone bounded the school site. Implementation <br />of this buffer and fence satisfied the Use Permit condition for historic site mitigation and <br />memorialized in an undated letter from SHPD to Duane Kanuha, Director of the County <br />of Hawaii Planning. According to this letter, "We believe that [t]his site will be <br />adequately preserved and that the project will have `no effect' on historic sites." The <br />area was subsequently subdivided with the school lot designated as TMK: 6-8-001:058. <br />The fenced area to the property line constitutes the .047 -acre, undeveloped portion of the <br />property that was the subject of Haun and Associates 2016 study. A copy of this <br />Archeological Assessment was submitted to State Historic Preservation Commission <br />(SHPD) for consultation on November 12, 2016 and as of this writing, the Planning <br />Department has not received any response from SHPD. A condition of approval will <br />require that the applicant maintain the previously agreed upon 15 foot -buffer, which <br />encroaches on an .047 -acre portion of the subject property up to the existing chain link <br />fence. Based on the preceding, it is not anticipated that the proposed request will have <br />any adverse impact on cultural or historical resources in the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.