Laserfiche WebLink
FC-77 Page 2 February 6, 2018 <br /> Council Member Karen Eoff stated that what she was hearing was that some members wanted a <br /> little more time to hear from the public and this is why a public hearing is required.' <br /> Ms. Poindexter commented that she felt the difference when Mr. Onishi was on the council was <br /> that there was no transit master plan to show the community and feel this could be the selling <br /> point. The extension is in good faith that we are making sure that we are getting public input and <br /> not putting it on the fast track. <br /> Ms. David understands everyone comments on this, when this senate bill came out, we were <br /> under a tight gun that this bill was coming forward. Although it was my intention to get it out to <br /> the community, I felt we should support the efforts of our legislature and maybe we would be <br /> granted an extension. <br /> Council Member Herbert M. Richards, III, agree with the members stating that this may send <br /> mixed messages. The mindset of the council is to go up to council with a negative <br /> recommendation and I do not feel we are ready in the current form. I do not see a balance and so <br /> cannot support this going forward. <br /> Council Member Dru Kanuha does not have a problem with moving this to council with a <br /> positive recommendation but the problem from there is going to be what happens with the GET. <br /> That is when it will be more of an issue. <br /> Your Committee on Finance is in accord with the purpose and intent of Resolution No. 488-18, <br /> and forwards it to Council with a negative recommendattion. <br /> dmm <br /> AYES NOES ABS EX Respectfully submitted, <br /> CHUNG X <br /> DAVID x COMMITTEE ON FINANCE <br /> EOFF X <br /> KANUHA X r--- <br /> LEE LOY X <br /> O'HARA X4111111.1./ <br /> POINDEXTER x MAILE DAVID, CHAIR <br /> RICHARDS X FC REPORT NO.: 77 <br /> RUGGLES X ADOPTED: <br />