My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1026.000 2016-2018
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2016-2018
>
COM 1026.000 2016-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2018 12:01:34 PM
Creation date
8/13/2018 9:44:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2016-2018
Communication
1026
Point
000
Author
Wil Okabe, Managing Director, Office of the Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2018/09/05 2016-2018
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2018/09/19 2016-2018
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Council
AGE PC 2018/08/21 (2016-2018)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 179 Draft 01 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2016-2018
REP PC 071 2018/08/21 (2016-2018)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2016-2018\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • 1 <br /> 9 s <br /> ALAMEDA: Follow-up? <br /> YUEN: And we would look at that as basically okay while they were living <br /> on the property. And to give an example ofthis similar kind of accommodation, if a <br /> plumber has a van that has, you know, Al's Plumbing on the sign, the plumbing company <br /> is full o fplumbing equipment, and the person takes it home and parks it at their home in <br /> an RS zone, we do not cite people for that kind ofusage. It's a vehicle that they use at <br /> work but they also, it's also used as a personal vehicle that they may drive around in or <br /> they may go to and from work. So we don't look at that as a violation even in an RS <br /> zone. So I don't think we need to say anything specifically in the zoning conditions <br /> about that kind ofusage. But it needs to be, I think we do have an understanding here on <br /> the record that the'CN zoning does not authorize the use o f the site as a baseyard for <br /> buses. <br /> Then on the other issue, on the issues, you know, we did have complaints, we did cite the • <br /> complaints and they did establish a baseyard in an ML zone for the buses as a result of <br /> the complaints. I don't look at that as a failure o f our enforcement process. If there were <br /> other violations then we, ifwe have other complaints we will follow-up on those and <br /> investigate it and see if there was a violation. <br /> And then the final thing I did want to mention though that there has been this discussion <br /> ofthe, and this is a recurrent thing in the Waiakea House Lots area, a conflict between <br /> commercial and residential uses. The General Plan does identify the area as Medium <br /> Density Urban which opens the opportunity for commercial uses, that passed the County <br /> Council. There's also a course o f action in the General Plan that talks about Kekuanaoa <br /> Street being a site for a future commercial development; and that also passed the County <br /> Council in 2005 as a specific course o f action. <br /> ALAMEDA: Mr. Lim, response? • <br /> LIM: I guess it's finally, we'd like to give the Planning Commission the <br /> • applicant's commitment that they understand fully the ramifications of any ofthose mini <br /> busses coming onto the property. So we're going to take additional steps to make sure <br /> that that doesn't happen. We'd ask for your support ofthis rezoning. I,think <br /> Mr. Watanabe has a question. <br /> ALAMEDA: Okay. Sure, Mr. Watanabe, question for Mr. Lim or the Director? <br /> WATANABE:. Yeah, I have a question for Mr. Lim. Earlier I asked ifyou would <br /> agree or the applicant would agree to limiting subdivision or resubdivision to two parcels. <br /> And another thing has come up, maybe we can just change the zoning to CN-15 or <br /> something like that which automatically states that, given the lot size. <br /> LIM: We could agree to the first where there'd be no more than two lots <br /> on the rezoned property. We couldn't agree to the second cause that would require us to <br /> • reprocess the whole application. <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.