Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • 1 <br /> 9 s <br /> ALAMEDA: Follow-up? <br /> YUEN: And we would look at that as basically okay while they were living <br /> on the property. And to give an example ofthis similar kind of accommodation, if a <br /> plumber has a van that has, you know, Al's Plumbing on the sign, the plumbing company <br /> is full o fplumbing equipment, and the person takes it home and parks it at their home in <br /> an RS zone, we do not cite people for that kind ofusage. It's a vehicle that they use at <br /> work but they also, it's also used as a personal vehicle that they may drive around in or <br /> they may go to and from work. So we don't look at that as a violation even in an RS <br /> zone. So I don't think we need to say anything specifically in the zoning conditions <br /> about that kind ofusage. But it needs to be, I think we do have an understanding here on <br /> the record that the'CN zoning does not authorize the use o f the site as a baseyard for <br /> buses. <br /> Then on the other issue, on the issues, you know, we did have complaints, we did cite the • <br /> complaints and they did establish a baseyard in an ML zone for the buses as a result of <br /> the complaints. I don't look at that as a failure o f our enforcement process. If there were <br /> other violations then we, ifwe have other complaints we will follow-up on those and <br /> investigate it and see if there was a violation. <br /> And then the final thing I did want to mention though that there has been this discussion <br /> ofthe, and this is a recurrent thing in the Waiakea House Lots area, a conflict between <br /> commercial and residential uses. The General Plan does identify the area as Medium <br /> Density Urban which opens the opportunity for commercial uses, that passed the County <br /> Council. There's also a course o f action in the General Plan that talks about Kekuanaoa <br /> Street being a site for a future commercial development; and that also passed the County <br /> Council in 2005 as a specific course o f action. <br /> ALAMEDA: Mr. Lim, response? • <br /> LIM: I guess it's finally, we'd like to give the Planning Commission the <br /> • applicant's commitment that they understand fully the ramifications of any ofthose mini <br /> busses coming onto the property. So we're going to take additional steps to make sure <br /> that that doesn't happen. We'd ask for your support ofthis rezoning. I,think <br /> Mr. Watanabe has a question. <br /> ALAMEDA: Okay. Sure, Mr. Watanabe, question for Mr. Lim or the Director? <br /> WATANABE:. Yeah, I have a question for Mr. Lim. Earlier I asked ifyou would <br /> agree or the applicant would agree to limiting subdivision or resubdivision to two parcels. <br /> And another thing has come up, maybe we can just change the zoning to CN-15 or <br /> something like that which automatically states that, given the lot size. <br /> LIM: We could agree to the first where there'd be no more than two lots <br /> on the rezoned property. We couldn't agree to the second cause that would require us to <br /> • reprocess the whole application. <br /> 24 <br />