Laserfiche WebLink
if required we can consolidate the two properties OR provide an easement. <br />B. 2-,rd'' <br />:.gt1jmetable and Cost <br />The applicant intends to secure Vrje balance of If. -he required comstruction peri -nits <br />and' be -gin making the appropriate infrastructure improvements immediately upon <br />securing all deve;opm entapprovals and permits. <br />The applicants the cost of the basic infrastructure and on-_fte <br />lrnprovenie,nts to bernore t1han $1-00,000. This cost would inducle Site Preparation, <br />as well as all Irequired on ia nd off-site irnproliernentS such, -,Is the Cm b! gutter and <br />si.devv?alk fronfing the subject- area improvennants. <br />IV. INSTITUTIONAi. CONSIDERATIONS <br />-k State Land Use <br />The Subject properbi IS designated Urban. As such, a boundary annendment- to <br />cover the requested Cn-20 zone is not neaded. <br />B. �Qo.�,WvGenerai Plan <br />Tine County Geneeral Plan Land Usie NA ern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) rylap <br />designates the Site Medium Density. As such, a General Plan arnencirrient to the <br />LUPAG main would not be requOred. it should be rioted that while the Ph.nning <br />Director initiated interim arnandfrients include some changes to the House lot <br />area, note is being proposed for the swbj,-ct parcel. <br />Relative to the N'ledium Density designation, the General Plan @11ovils consideration <br />for "'Village and neighborhood commercial, residential ­ an to 35 units per acre'. <br />"The rewuesied zoning and planned useswouldbe consistent with the uses <br />envisioned within the Medium area. <br />C, Hlio Comaiumt Develoomen't N8" <br />The Co-mr,nunity Development Plan (CDP) attempts to further define the General <br />Pl'mi and serves as a quide for decision -makers. It was aclopted by the Planning <br />Commission in 1975, aver 25 nears ago. Although reviewed by the County Council, <br />the CDP was never ado ned. <br />The CDR Land Use Concept map identifies a RKI-4 designation for this area. <br />Although the proposed uses are not residential, it should be noted that requested <br />CN -20 zoningwould allow single and multi -family residential uses. <br />Notwithstanding the technical inconsistency, however, it should be noted that the <br />General Plan has been amended three (3) tries, and much has occurred in the way <br />