Laserfiche WebLink
Linder this scenario, the site would not be utilized to its highest and <br />best use, as envisioned by the General -Plan and the commercial and <br />residential growth of the general area, <br />2.D"ewelowwent Based of, Existing 115-10 Zoning, <br />Under this aiternative, the area of the requested zoning may bf--' used <br />for t�,vo relic -lances. The site could also be subdivided, and eacin of _-he <br />la t could then bc- -Mnstrvc-111,ed uvitt an Maria unit. IMbile that may be <br />Possibale, residential uses; hoijvewer, nfiay riot be 1aa desirab)a, d-ue to <br />noise associated with tfle traffic along ;111a ono Street, <br />3, Residential Pfzaning <br />Another ap'tion could he to utili7e this site for a denser residential <br />project. While that woiuid still ba consistent with the General LUPAG's <br />map Medlurn Density ehiesignation, N., nnay not be tooire IsIble, Criven its <br />0 ?:� <br />IOC2-flon next to a major connector road and the cost of the required <br />off-site infraslructure. <br />4. Evaluation of Afternative <br />Leaving the propertyinits current state would not maximize the use of <br />the )and. The land could continue to be used residentially, Hoykiever, <br />tierern-ay be some saftetry tactor, given the collector road function of <br />Manono Street. This would also mean having to redirect cornniercial <br />USI -S tO Othe" area Hilo, areas that arc- increasingly, becoming less <br />available. ' <br />There wouid also be diminished tax revenues and less services to tht, <br />While ;aIternative residential densities are possible, those uses rna�, not <br />be desirable, given its frontage along a heavily traveled road and the <br />cost to provide, the required off-site infrastructure. <br />Neither, of the above alternatives could best deliver some needed off- <br />site infrastructure improvement as iitiould the requested commercial <br />project. The proposed project would make improvements fronting <br />13 <br />