My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0196.001 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 0196.001 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2019 12:53:33 PM
Creation date
3/25/2019 3:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
0196
Point
001
Author
Michael Yee, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2019/04/09 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2019/04/23 2018-2020
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would be responsible for dealing with any additional runoff or any additional flooding that may <br /> occur because of their development; they can't be required and they won't be required to deal <br /> with what's already there because it's in a flood zone. <br /> VITOUSEK: Got you. <br /> KAY: Yeah. <br /> VITOUSEK: Next question, I saw that the Department of Water Supply reviewed the previous <br /> submittal— <br /> KAY: Yeah, so, yeah–sorry, go ahead and ask your question. <br /> VIOUTSEK: Just wondering if they had any similar comments on the current proposed layout. <br /> KAY: So, the issue with–I should step back-the applicant initiallycame in with a Change of <br /> Zone from Agricultural-40 acres to Family Agricultural-1 acre for a six-lot subdivision. <br /> Midstream they changed their request to Ag-5A,being more consistent with the surrounding <br /> zoning, more consistent with the General Plan and the CDP: The comment letter that we got <br /> form Water Supply was addressing the six-lot subdivision; the two, I guess,northernmost lots <br /> would have been out of their pressure zone,the service pressure zone, from the Department of <br /> Water Supply. Now with the new proposed subdivision, the upper lot would be within the <br /> elevation, the proper elevation, that Water could service the lot: Sowe asked for an additional <br /> comment to supplement what they had, we did not receive it, but based on their initial comment, <br /> based on our understanding of where the pressure zone is, we didn't think it would be an issue to <br /> get water to the second lot. <br /> UNGER: Go ahead. <br /> SHIMAOKA: Were there,with the previous owners, were there previous applications to zone <br /> changes? <br /> KAY: Not that I'm aware of for this property, other than just the original request,which was to <br /> FA-1 at the beginning of this rezone process. But I'm not aware of any rezone requests for this <br /> particular parcel in the.past. <br /> SHIMAOKA: What there has been,because I know this property— <br /> KAY: Okay. <br /> SHIMAOKA: —and so the question is the rezoning requests got continually turned down, but <br /> this one is being approved. Do you know why? <br /> KAY: Um— <br /> SHIMAOKA: I know the previous owners of this property. <br /> 5 <br /> DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.