Laserfiche WebLink
The Planning Director is recommending that we forward a favorable recommendation for both <br /> the Change of Zone and the State Land Use Boundary Amendment to the County Council with <br /> conditions. Since the Background and Recommendation was sent to the Commission, there were <br /> two documents that we provided to you. One was just an amendment to Condition S, and that <br /> was just to clear up what we're talking about in terms of what types of lots, or what would be <br /> required in terms of making the fair share contribution. Used a condition that normally would <br /> apply to commercial zoning, and so I just wanted to clear that up that what we're talking about <br /> here is residential lots created since the resulting action here is going to be a subdivision. So, <br /> and also, that the trigger for paying that fair share is prior to Final Subdivision Approval. So, <br /> any new lot that's going to be slated for a residence will be assessed this fair share value. We <br /> did have one caveat to that, and that's at the bottom, that the fair market value of the lands to be <br /> dedicated for park expansion as required in Condition R shall be credited against the fair share <br /> requirement, because they're donating the land to a regional park. <br /> The other document that we received this morning, or yesterday, sorry, late yesterday, was a <br /> piece of testimony from Barbara Andersen. You should have gotten that either late yesterday or <br /> this morning, and it's just questions about traffic impacts of the development on Wainaku. <br /> With that, I'm happy to answer any questions the Commission may have. <br /> AU: Mr. Chair, I have a question. <br /> KAY: Yes? <br /> AU: So, did the Applicant request for this amendment to Condition S? Was that, was it the <br /> Applicant's— <br /> KAY: No, no, the, sorry,the amendment to Condition S was a Director-initiated amendment, <br /> and it's just again to clean up the language. Before it was talking about a number of residential <br /> units developed. Again, the trigger here is going to be a Final Subdivision Approval, and its <br /> number of lots developed, so we just wanted to clean`that up in terms of the language. So, yeah, <br /> it was a Director-initiated—: <br /> AU: Thank you. <br /> KAY: Yeah. <br /> CLARKSON: Any further questions? <br /> RAFFIPIY: Mr. Chair, I have a question. You know that, the 2.1, the 2.11-acres that will be set <br /> aside for the State Historic Preservation? <br /> KAY: Yes. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Yeah, will—who will be controlling that after, if the rezoning is— <br /> 4 <br />