Laserfiche WebLink
KAY: —Sure— <br /> RAFFIPIY: —goes through. <br /> KAY: So, if you take a look at your Recommendation for the Change of Zone, let me find the <br /> condition here, all of this comes from—once the cemetery was identified on the property, there <br /> was an archaeological inventory survey done, and also a burial treatment plan done. SHPD has <br /> those documents. They have yet to review them, so we haven't gotten any comments back from <br /> them. There was also a matter of some violations `cause some of the headstones were damaged <br /> from clearing work. So, parthold-up <br /> of the from SHPD's side was they didn't want to review <br /> those documents until the violation was dealt with at the State level. Unfortunately, that's why <br /> this application came in in 2017 and now we're only getting to it in 2019. We got to a point <br /> where we were told by SHPD that they were no longer pursuing the violation, and so we decided <br /> to move forward with this. But, the condition we added in was to make sure that, that conditions <br /> of that AIS and any subsequent study that would be done, whether that's the burial treatment <br /> plan or a preservation plan, be added into the, to the subdivision, and one of those requirements <br /> was to set aside an area for preservation in place. So, I believe the 2.11 acres came from the <br /> AIS, and that's the idea there, so that's why, that's where they'd be locked in.`And, the <br /> condition is—sorry—Condition P. Is,the question who will own the property or who will control <br /> the property? <br /> RAFFIPIY: Yeah, I wanted to know if, well, if they—right now, right now, the Trust owns that, <br /> right? Right now, right? <br /> KAY: Correct. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Okay, so their wishes, their wish is to convey that to, you know, to State or are they <br /> going to kind of need to hold it for-?` <br /> KAY: I believe and maybe, maybe the owner's representative can address that— <br /> RAFFIPIY•- —Okay— <br /> KAY: —but I believe it will would just stay in ownership of whomever owns the property. But, <br /> the requirements to keep it preserved— <br /> RAFFIPIY: —Yeah, I see— <br /> KAY: —and allow descendants to come and visit and things like that are all part of the AIS and <br /> subsequent preservation plan, so they would all be required to adhere to those requirements <br /> moving forward, regardless of who owns it, yeah. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Okay, so—so, will they be submitting some kind of plan on,preservation plan, how <br /> they're going to preserve it? <br /> 5 <br />