My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0042.060 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0042.060 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2020 4:09:29 PM
Creation date
3/9/2020 11:01:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0042
Point
060
Author
K. Angel Pilago, Councilmember Co-Chair, Planning Committee
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Council: Bill 163, Draft 4 amended to Draft 5 - 1/21/05 PC-3: Minority report authored by Councilmembers Arakaki and Holschuh, disapproving the passage of Bill 163 on first reading - 01/04/05 PC-2: Recs. Bill 163, Draft 1, as amended to Draft 4, pass 1st reading - 1/4/05 (Note: Drafts 2 & 3 were filed; original Draft 1 was amended to Draft 4) Below is the Committee history for all drafts of the General Plan: PC: Public Hearing - 1/3/05 (Below is for all three drafts) PC: Held over for public hearing - 12/20/04 PC: Deferred - 11/23/04 (Below includes Dr. 2) PC: Workshop, Keauhou Beach Hotel (includes Dr. 2) - 6/15/04 PC: Workshop - Hilo (includes Dr. 2) - 6/14/04 (Below history is on first draft only) PC: Workshop, Hilo - 12/18/03 PC: Workshop, Hilo (ag land portion) - 4/19/03 PC: Workshop, Hilo - 2/10/03 PC: Deferred - 11/19/02 PC: Deferred - 10/22/02 PC: Deferred - 10/08/02 PC: Public hearings on the General Plan were held, as follows: Konawaena Elemetary, 6/20/02; HOVE, 6/25/02; Keaau Community Center, 7/1/02; Waimea, 7/17/02; Kapaau, 7/18/02; Pahoa, 8/20/02; and Naalehu, 10/1/02 PC: Deferred - 02/20/02
Document Relationships
BIL 163 Draft 04 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
REP PC 002 01/04/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 003 01/04/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
503
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
[Plan Implementation <br /> One of the most critical phases of the planning program is the implementation of the <br /> General Plan. It is the use of the plan rather than its mere existence which is of benefit. Public <br /> understanding and support are vitally necessary as the responsibility for the development of the <br /> island of Hawaii rests not only with the administrative and legislative branches of the County but <br /> with all people who live here. Widespread discussion will promote the understanding of unique <br /> and innovative concepts which are presented in the plan. <br /> Implementation of the General Plan requires the development of middle and short range <br /> community, functional, and area plans. It also requires a systematic review of implementing <br /> ordinances such as the zoning and subdivision codes and the adoption of amendments to these <br /> codes in accordance with policies and standards of the General Plan. <br /> The implementation of the General Plan is also related to the capital improvement and <br /> operating budgets. The capital improvements budget encompasses public improvements and <br /> facilities to accommodate the anticipated growth, and the County operational budget encompasses <br /> programs and services. Both are major components of the implementation of General Plan <br /> policies. <br /> Implementation of the General Plan policies also require the adoption of ordinances to <br /> establish programs such as historic sites, housing, area improvement financing, areas of natural <br /> beauty and the like. <br /> Although fifteen years have elapsed since the adoption of the County's planning program <br /> all of the major components have yet to be put in place. Furthermore, the planning process must <br /> be viewed as a continuous non-linear and dynamic process instead of a static and linear one. <br /> Unanticipated opportunities as well as unexpected delays necessitate adjustments to programs, <br /> standards, and policies. Nevertheless, standard procedures must be followed to insure <br /> implementation in a comprehensive and orderly fashion. The following procedures shall be <br /> <br /> required to provide the necessary guidance: <br /> The General Plan, and any comprehensive review, should be widely distributed for review, <br /> discussion, and comments. <br /> Input from community organizations shall be solicited to assist and advise the Planning <br /> Department, Planning Commission and Council. <br /> The Planning Commission shall hold public hearings in the principal communities <br /> throughout the County. <br /> After the completion of the public hearings for the revision program, the Planning <br /> Commission can suggest modifications to the Planning Director and/or submit the revised <br /> General Plan with recommendations to the Mayor for transmittal to the County Council. <br /> 10 <br /> Introduction <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.