My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Communication No. 2019-09- KCDP Amendments PD Review
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Kona Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Communications
>
2019
>
Communication No. 2019-09- KCDP Amendments PD Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2019 2:45:30 PM
Creation date
5/2/2019 3:14:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Communication No. 2019-09 <br />HNHP database includes four categories: Natural Communities, Speci al Vertebrates, Special <br />Invertebrates, and Special Plants. The HNHP database includes only rare occurrences. A <br />natural community is considered rare and imperiled if it is known from 20 or fewer localities or if <br />it covers less than 2,000 acres in the worl d. For plants and animals, the HNHP defines taxon <br />as rare if records indicate that its current distribution or abundance is limited, i.e. it is known <br />from 20 or fewer locations or fewer than 3,000 individuals have been observed in the wild.) <br />4.3.2 Overall Strat egy <br />People in Kona have a growing ecological awareness and respect for their diverse resources one that <br />must be translated into a commitment to protect and manage these resources. This commitment will only <br />be implemented by policies that are based on k nowledge about our diverse resources as well as on <br />humility that we do not know the full consequences of all th at we do and err on the side of caution <br />(precautionary principle), and on the understanding that all of us must assume some responsibility to do our <br />part. <br /> <br />The following strategy emerged from this attitude: <br />1. Managing our Impacts. The reasons to minimize hu man impacts on natural resources are many, <br />while many are yet to be known. Ecosystem services upon which our survival depends (e.g., clean <br />drink <br />clearly in the <br />the intrinsic value and interconnectedness of all natural systems should be expanded upon and <br />protected through education and intelligent land use policy. The Kona CDP <br />intended to limit both urban and rural sprawl and also serves to provide direct benefits toward <br />managing our resources. <br />a. Recognizing the Multi - Value Importance of the Mauka Lands. Before human contact, a band <br />of wet native forest t hrived, extending from sea level to 6,000 feet in elevation (Atlas of <br />Edition). Beside being a habitat for native species, this for <br />cleared for pasture or other purposes, much of the rainfall that would have been absorbed now <br />runs off the land surfac e. Recognizing the value of these mauka lands for its habitat, groundwater <br />recharge, and stormwater management values, the objectives are to encourage the preservation of <br />the forest that remains, the restoration of forest lands, as well as the innovative restoration of some <br />of the innate functions of the cleared lands (e.g., detention basins that mitigate surface flow and <br />promote groundwater recharge). <br />b. Turning Stormwater Management Into An Asset. If the mauka lands are able to mitigate some <br />of the surface stormwater runoff, there is still a challenge in managing stormwater runoff because <br /> and undefined drainageways. The objective is to identify the <br />drainageways where the major stormflows would be directed, provide a buffer to the se <br />drainageways to account for our imperfect knowledge, and to design these drainageways to <br />function as recreat ional or open space amenities (e.g., linear parks). <br />c. Not Exceeding the Limits of the Groundwater Resource. Compared to the wet, windward side <br />of - <br />level groundwate r; the extent of which as a resource is uncertain. The objectives are to conserve <br />water, encourage alternative sources (e.g., reclaimed wastewat er) for non - potable uses, and <br />ensure adequate capacity of the County water system to serve the preferred growth areas set forth <br />32 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.