My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-04-24 BDHRA Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Banyan Drive HRA
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-04-24 BDHRA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2019 11:14:29 AM
Creation date
5/3/2019 11:14:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />DELIMA: Because the sewer, doesn’t the sewer line run along the street? <br /> <br />ROY: Right along here. <br /> <br />DELIMA: Yeah, so to me commercial mixed use would make sense because you have the <br />infrastructure there to accommodate the waste. So, and it’s within, if you have good traffic area, <br />so it would make sense for us to do that. And the reason I’m opposed to the open designation, <br />and I want to facilitate the rezoning is because if you don’t do so and you continue the open, the <br />private developer will be unable to maintain their property and then it deteriorates and then it <br />doesn’t get the use that it should. It just would be better for the overall community and that’s the <br />same argument I’m, I’ve made regarding the Ice House. And I’ve disclosed previous meetings, <br />but for the sake of disclosure, I previously represented Mr. Bockrath, I do not represent him now, <br />have not for a while, so I don’t believe I have a conflict, but I think it’s important that I disclose <br />that past representation. But I still think that we should designate because if it continues to, for <br />example, I’m supportive of the park and we would not want to have activities at the Ice House <br />that would not complement the park area. But the present zoning doesn’t facilitate the private <br />owner to act in a way to maintain the property so it doesn’t become an eyesore. So if you provide <br />the landowner a reasonable economic use of the property, then it can be complementary to the, to <br />the park. So I, that’s my thought on that. And then in regards to the Hilo Bay Café, now that’s <br />leasehold property, belongs to the State, but that too is open. And the Suisan parcel is also open. <br /> <br />ROY: No, the, currently these are in the limited industrial. This is all limited industrial here. <br /> <br />DELIMA: Oh, the zoning is limited industrial? <br /> <br />ROY: That’s current, yeah. This is the current zoning. <br /> <br />CANNON-EGER: Go back one more and show Mr. DeLima that Suisan is that privately held— <br /> <br />DELIMA: Yeah, I see that little small blue area, right? <br /> <br />CANNON-EGER: Small blue triangle is Suisan and that’s a privately held parcel. <br /> <br />ROY: So this is a map of ownership of the current— <br /> <br />DELIMA: Suisan is a privately held parcel but the Hilo Bay Café is a leasehold property. <br /> <br />GADDIS: Yeah, correct. <br /> <br />DELIMA: Now, and you’re saying that the Hilo Bay Café and the Suisan is all in a industrial? <br /> <br />ROY: It’s called limited industrial, 20,000 square foot. So yeah, it’s industrial but limited to <br />size. <br /> <br />DELIMA: So it’s consistent with the General Plan and— <br /> <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />Banyan Drive Hawaiʽi Redevelopment Agency <br />April 24, 2019 Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.