My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Communication No. 2019-08- CDP GP Input
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Kona Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Communications
>
2019
>
Communication No. 2019-08- CDP GP Input
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2019 2:35:28 PM
Creation date
5/14/2019 2:35:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Communication No. 2019-08 <br />Action Committee Feedback on GP Updates 2019 <br />North Kohala Action Committee South Kohala Action Committee <br />Puna Action Committee 03.05.2019 Kona Action Committee 03.12.2019 03.18.2019 03.25.2019 <br />How do we ensure implementation Where does infrastructure fit in? What will the relationship of the Action Will there be a common repeatable <br />Committee to the Planning Commission <br />prioritization of spending of funds in be? <br />implementation and a set timeline for Is it possible for applications to be <br />implementation. reviewed by the Action Committee <br />before it goes to the Planning <br />Commission? <br />She would like to see incentive packages How is Natural Resources being planned Time constraints for the Action Is there currently a rule to force the <br />for developers to promote development for? Committee need to be considered in the update to the GP to start and finish <br />that is desired by the community, similar review process of applications. The within a specific timeframe? Will there be <br />to 201H. Action Committee only meets every one in the GP 20 year update cycle? <br />other month. <br />She has concerns over transportation Communities and community planning How will the County ensure consistency <br />being addressed towards the end of the 5 should be closer linked to natural of info and rules across all staff and to have 5 or 10 year update cycles for <br />year plan for implementation. She would resource planning County departments to better shorter term goals/actions. Some <br />like to see it be address earlier on in 5 help/inform the community? sections may become outdated faster <br />year implementation plan. which would call for amendments to just <br />portions of the CDP. <br />How will the point of singularity be Natural Resources belong to communities Implementation/application of plans by We need an overview piece of each <br />addressed in the GP and CDP updates? the County has not been great. We need section to highlight overlaps with other <br />The point of singularity may happen more consistent progress on plans. sections. A comprehensive high level plan <br />before we reach the 20 year GP update at the beginning to frame other sections. <br />cycle. <br />Natural Resources and Community We really need to get community input. We need to get the community input <br />Planning should happen up front in We need to consider the BEST way to UPFRONT in the update process. <br />process and then inform Land-Use. reach the greater community. <br />Rat lungworm, R.O.D., and other invasive Maybe infrastructure should go 1st? The Action Committee may not be able to CIP priority updates every 6 years? <br />issues need to be address in the General fulfil its role unless it meets monthly. The <br />Plan to better inform public health and Planning Commission is more effective <br />conservation. with community in this way. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.