My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Communication No. 2019-08- CDP GP Input
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Kona Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Communications
>
2019
>
Communication No. 2019-08- CDP GP Input
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2019 2:35:28 PM
Creation date
5/14/2019 2:35:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Communication No. 2019-08 <br />Action Committee Feedback on GP Updates 2019 <br />North Kohala Action Committee South Kohala Action Committee <br />Puna Action Committee 03.05.2019 Kona Action Committee 03.12.2019 03.18.2019 03.25.2019 <br />Wanted clarification that proposed She supports the revision of inter- How will 6 year CIP updates align with <br />departmental communications with each Council terms? <br />participating in annual CIP/ Infrastructure other and with the Action Committee. <br />Process <br />Will there be amendment opportunity We need to reorder the process for each What items are on the South Kohala CIP <br />between the update cycles? community as follows: and how do we know where they are in <br />1. Natural Resource Planning 2. the 6 year process? <br />Community Planning and Place Making 3. <br />Economic and Opportunity Planning 4. <br />Infrastructure Planning <br />Natural Resource section can be used to We should consider which CDPs/ACs to <br />prioritize due diligence (e.g. Can it be brought back after the 6 years? <br />Archaeological and Environmental needs through meeting with them and <br />Impacts) that could be used during gathering their input. <br />infrastructure phase. <br />Feels that community/ place-making She agrees with the 20 year update Has Planning considered staffing <br />needs to be integrated in all sections. process, as 25 years marks a generation. issues/capacity in the GP and CDP <br />consecutive updates? <br />Is community share-out appropriate We need to make sure the update How will the needs of south Kohala <br />during summer as people may be process is appropriate. translate to influence the North Kohala <br />traveling? CDP and vice versa? <br />Will input from various AC(s) be shared We need to focus on CIP implementation, How will communication between South <br />with each other? and we need better inter-departmental and North Kohala be facilitated? <br />communications to accomplish this. <br />We need room for amendments as Someone needs to be looking at plans to <br />budget cycles to be aligned with CDP(s) determine if they are in agreement with <br />implementation cycles. scheduled updates to respond to <br />changes. do this and provide guidance to the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Will the update process involve the We (AC) used to get a list of <br />creation of subcommittees to address developments happening in the CDP <br />specific topic areas? area, and we would like to see this <br />happen again. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.