Laserfiche WebLink
COMMITTEE ON AGING MEETING - MINUTES <br />March 29, 2019 <br />Page 3 <br />Kimo asks that the committee review the handout for his plan and would <br />like the committee's feedback by the next meeting so that the next draft <br />can be prepared. <br />nicrnccinn <br />1. Lito asked about "No Wrong Door" — Hawai'i County is embarking with <br />the State. The state is currently in its second round of grants (6' year). <br />Funding for the program is through DHS. There are no milestones to date. <br />The intent of the program is to steer people the right way in the beginning. <br />However at the State level currently misses the medial and social pieces. <br />Funding in the 2019 state budget has $9M for Kupuna Care (KC) and $3M <br />for the Aging and Disability Resource Centers. Hawai'i County office fil- <br />ters referrals through the Office on Aging. They are currently trying an <br />electronic system that is HIPAA compliant. <br />2. Frankie asked why the Department of Parks and Recreation (P&R) is in <br />charge of the Elder Services. It would make sense to have it all services un- <br />der the Office of Aging. Kimo commented that it was the way that funds <br />come down so that certain programs must be administered by P&R. <br />3. Meizhu thanks Kimo for the office's transparency, and allowing this Com- <br />mittee to engage in significant conversations regarding our Community. <br />7. CASE MANAGEMENT: Lito Asuncion and Sub -Committee Report <br />After much soul searching and research, the Sub -Committee recommends that <br />Case Management should not be brought in-house. The Mayor was concerned <br />about the employee costs since health and retirement benefits last long after an <br />employee leaves and/or their grant funding is cut. The main concerns of the <br />committee were to ensure equitable distribution of case management services <br />across the island, and to reduce wait time before a client gets called back and <br />their issue taken care of. Under the current system, all agreed that clients were <br />happy with the services, but sometimes were dissatisfied with the wait time. <br />To ensure wider coverage, the committee recommended a vendor pool model, <br />with case management contracts awarded to more than one agency rather than <br />just to one as in the past; this might be geographically based. To shorten wait <br />time, the committee noted that the current process could be shortened even be- <br />fore there are referrals to case management. <br />