My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-05-02 Hearing Transcript - Edmund C. Olson Trust SLU 17-049 REZ 17-223
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2019
>
2019-05-02 Hearing Transcript - Edmund C. Olson Trust SLU 17-049 REZ 17-223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2019 1:52:17 PM
Creation date
6/6/2019 1:52:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Planning Director is recommending that we forward a favorable recommendation for both <br />the Change of Zone and the State Land Use Boundary Amendment to the County Council with <br />conditions. Since the Background and Recommendation was sent to the Commission, there were <br />two documents that we provided to you. One was just an amendment to Condition S, and that <br />was just to clear up what we're talking about in terms of what types of lots, or what would be <br />required in terms of making the fair share contribution. Used a condition that normally would <br />apply to commercial zoning, and so I just wanted to clear that up that what we're talking about <br />here is residential lots created since the resulting action here is going to be a subdivision. So, <br />and also, that the trigger for paying that fair share is prior to Final Subdivision Approval. So, <br />any new lot that's going to be slated for a residence will be assessed this fair share value. We <br />did have one caveat to that, and that's at the bottom, that the fair market value of the lands to be <br />dedicated for park expansion as required in Condition R shall be credited against the fair share <br />requirement, because they're donating the land to a regional park. <br />The other document that we received this morning, or yesterday, sorry, late yesterday, was a <br />piece of testimony from Barbara Andersen. You should have gotten that either late yesterday or <br />this morning, and it's just questions about traffic impacts of the development on Wainaku. <br />With that, I'm happy to answer any questions the Commission may have. <br />AU: Mr. Chair, I have a question. <br />KAY: Yes? <br />AU: So, did the Applicant request for this amendment to Condition S? Was that, was it the <br />Applicant's <br />KAY: No, no, the, sorry, the amendment to Condition S was a Director -initiated amendment, <br />and it's just again to clean up the language. Before it was talking about a number of residential <br />units developed. Again, the trigger here is going to be a Final Subdivision Approval, and its <br />number of lots developed, so we just wanted to clean that up in terms of the language. So, yeah, <br />it was a Director -initiated. <br />AU: Thank you. <br />KAY: Yeah. <br />CLARKSON: Any further questions? <br />RAFFIPIY: Mr. Chair, I have a question. You know that, the 2. 1, the 2.11 -acres that will be set <br />aside for the State Historic Preservation? <br />KAY: Yes. <br />RAFFIPIY: Yeah, willwho will be controlling that after, if the rezoning is <br />EXHIBIT A <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.