My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-05-02 Hearing Transcript - Edmund C. Olson Trust SLU 17-049 REZ 17-223
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2019
>
2019-05-02 Hearing Transcript - Edmund C. Olson Trust SLU 17-049 REZ 17-223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2019 1:52:17 PM
Creation date
6/6/2019 1:52:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KAY: So, that's, that's what remains to be seen. Because SHPD has yet to review the original <br />archaeological inventory survey, they can't make their recommendations for next steps. Our <br />understanding is the recommendation will be some kind of preservation plan, and the <br />preservation plan will lay out interim mitigation steps as well as long-term mitigation steps and <br />so that will be done subsequently. And the way the condition reads, just to make sure, it's all <br />done prior to any work on the property is, "Prior to [the] issuance of any land alteration permits, <br />the applicant, its successors or assigns shall secure approval of an Archaeological Inventory <br />Survey [(AIS)] by the State Department of Land and Natural Resources – State Historic <br />Preservation Division [(DLNR-HPD)] and implement interim preservation mitigation measures <br />as may be recommended for the rezoned area. Moreover, prior to or as part of the issuance of <br />Final Subdivision Approval, the applicant shall implement mitigation measures for the historic <br />area cemetery as recommended by the AIS and directed by [DLNR-] SHPD." <br />So, essentially, we wanted to build in the requirement that prior to any more land alteration, they <br />had to install the interim mitigation measures. And then before we finalize Final Subdivision <br />Approval, they had to basically agree to and implement the long-term mitigation measures. <br />RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. <br />KAY: You're welcome. <br />CLARKSON: Any further questions? I have a question about the slide that's up right now. <br />KAY: Okay. <br />CLARKSON: What is the difference, I guess in law or ordinance, between the standards that the <br />residentially zoned, roads in the area of the residentially zoned lots, have to be versus the lots <br />zoned Ag. <br />KAY: So, County dedicable standard is a minimum 50 -foot right-of-way. I'm not sure of the <br />pavement width. Okay, yeah, so for the Ag portion further mauka, again, this is being proposed <br />as County dedicable, so the right-of-way would be—would be 50 feet. The Ag I believe is 20 <br />feet paved, and the Urban may be 24 to 30 concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk. <br />CLARKSON: Yeah, I'm actually referring to the two side roads that serve those lots <br />KAY: Oh these? <br />CLARKSON: Yeah. <br />KAY: So, the non-dedicable standard is a 20 -foot right-of-way, and I don't have it in front of <br />me. I'm not sure what the pavement would be, the pavement requirement, but it could be 12, <br />14I don't16, 16 -foot wide pavement within a 20 -foot right-of-way. We did <br />CLARKSON: No, I'm just curious because I have seen this over and over again, Ag <br />subdivisions, and usually they have to bring a pole out to the nearest County road. But, you're <br />EXHIBIT A <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.