My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-05-02 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless USE 19-079
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2019
>
2019-05-02 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless USE 19-079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2019 1:59:12 PM
Creation date
6/6/2019 1:59:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: All those in favor? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />CLARKSON: Opposed? Motion carried. Public testimony is closed. At this time, the Chair <br />will request a motion for action, and I believe I should say, have the proposed motions <br />incorporated the condition that you were discussing, Jeff? <br />ANDREWS: Yes, we've created a condition that could be included in an approval with <br />conditions. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, well, let's see if we have a motion for, we have to have a motion for <br />approval first. <br />HALL: Well, actually, I mean, you should have the proposed condition `cause now the <br />Department is proposing the condition to put into the Recommendation. So, if you want to <br />incorporate it into the Recommendation, then you should hear it first and then get the motion, <br />yeah. <br />CLARKSON: Oh, okay. <br />DARROW: The other issue or matter that should be addressed is to identify which, yeah, which <br />proposed possible location that the Commission would be looking at so that we could actually <br />incorporate that as well within the condition. That it be setback so far from the roadway. <br />CLARKSON: But, don't we need a motion for action before we amend the Recommendation? <br />The conditions? <br />DARROW: Sure. But, that was <br />CLARKSON: Okay <br />DARROW: just something we didn't anticipate adding in that additional language, but that <br />should be something we should also add to clarify exactly what setback there would be. Thank <br />you. <br />CLARKSON: So, do we have a motion for action on this item which we're probably going to <br />amend? <br />RAFFIPIY: So, Mr. Chairman, does that mean should I make a motion to accept either one of <br />these proposals first and then we move onto the other motion? <br />HALL: We should be including the motion which one. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.