Laserfiche WebLink
RAFFIPIY: So, if that's the case, I'm prepared to make a motion that we accept the revised <br />proposal to have the 155 setback to the edge of the road. <br />AGUINALDO: I second. <br />CLARKSON: Well, and there's one other condition I believe. If you could read us the draft of <br />the condition? <br />ANDREWS: Yes, certainly. It would be as stated, "Prior to submittal of an application for Plan <br />Approval, the applicant, successors, or assigns shall provide evidence of legal access from <br />Highway 130 to the subject parcel." <br />RAFFIPIY: I'd like to add that to my motion. <br />CLARKSON: Not to be picky, but does it have to be from Highway 130? Isn't it just legal <br />access okay? No? <br />HALL: The more specific the better. <br />CLARKSON: Okay. <br />AU: Mr. Chair, I have a question. Okay, so from what I read, I read from the original <br />Recommendation, there was nine conditions set forth, okay? And, I have another piece of paper, <br />and I could be wrong, there's seven conditions, and then there's another condition. So, is that <br />correct? I mean I'm looking at this paper, it says, forno, this is 4-20, 4-2. So, how many <br />original conditions are there? I'm looking at two different pages with conditions. I see a revised <br />condition on a <br />ANDREWS: Yeah, so those, the additional conditions were added following comments by U.S. <br />Fish & Wildlife Service, so they were adding, they were added to the original set of conditions. <br />AU: So, there's a total of 17 conditions? That's with the amended condition. That's what I'm <br />counting. <br />ANDREWS: That sounds like the correct total. <br />AU: So, there's nine plus seven, plus one, right? <br />ANDREWS: Hm-hmm. Yep. <br />AU: That would be seventeen, yeah? <br />ANDREWS: That would be seventeen. <br />AU: Okay, that was my question. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />13 <br />