2019-04-18 Leeward Exh A (SPP 19-205)

Home

existing driveway connections as well. So that would pretty much address the sight distance issue. UNGER: Okay, all right. FUKE: Relative to the drainage, by, by code already the, any, any activity done on the property would have to address the drainage requirements, you know, any project-generated water would have to be contained on site. In this situation here they'd have to come in for a Plan Approval for, you know, all of the existing structures and their proposed improvements. And the propo- the plan approval process requires the submission of a Department of Public Works approved drainage plan as part of the application process, and that's got to be incorporated into it. And whatever the drainage plan calls for, it has to be implemented prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. I think that what concerns that were raised relative to drainage is really like not project-generated as much as like what the existing condition is, you know, from the mauka area just kind of flowing on both the north end and the south end of the subject property. [Speaking to Mr. White] You want to expand a little bit more? I'm not so much familiar relative to what they're talking about on the, on the wall fronting Kuakini Highway and whether that needs to be improved or what. VITOUSEK: That would be a question, if I could, I believe that is referring to the State Inventory of Historic Properties site 14089, which doesn't serve the purpose of flood mitigation. So that would be, I think, two separate issues, right, flood mitigation and, that would have to be separate from the treatment of the historic site there, 14089. FUKE: Yeah, 14089 is an existing, that's an existing wall. VITOUSEK: Yup. FUKE: And so that, based on the, the existing DLNR- or SHPD-approved archaeological plan for this area kind of called for, I guess it's just, it was just recorded; it didn't call for its physical preservation. VITOUSEK: Correct. So I just see that not, not, that wall is not a flood mitigation wall FUKE: It's not, no VITOUSEK: —right there, no. FUKE: No, it's not a, it was just a boundary wall. VITOUSEK: Correct, yup. FUKE: So I need to have a little bit more understanding as far as what the specific issue is, and what, if anything the applicant can do to address that. 10 EXHIBIT A