Laserfiche WebLink
early, so by the time they get to Kona Sea Villas, they're, they're surpassingly faster. The <br /> second piece of it is the flood wall directly across from Kona Sea Villas on the northwest end of <br /> this property, which is an imminent status of failure. If this wall fails, which it most likely will <br /> the next, over, the following large tropical storm, it will substantially inundate and damage Kona <br /> Sea Villas. It's, as long as something is being done with this property, this wall needs to be <br /> repaired. It is repair—it doesn't need to be replaced; it needs to be repaired. So, that's our <br /> comments. Thank you for listening. <br /> UNGER: Great, thank you. You may be seated. Are there any other members of the public that <br /> wish to testify on this agenda item? Seeing none, I need a motion to close public testimony. <br /> VITOUSEK: I'll move to close public testimony on Agenda Item 1. <br /> SHIMAOKA: I'll second. <br /> UNGER: Motion by Commissioner Vitousek, second by Commissioner Shimaoka. All in <br /> favor? <br /> ALL: Aye. <br /> UNGER: Opposed? [None.] Public hearing is closed. Commissioners, at this time I'd like to <br /> entertain a motion on Agenda Item No. 1. <br /> CARR SMITH: I'd like for the applicant to address the drainage issue and the rock wall. Would <br /> that be better to be done first? <br /> UNGER: Sure, absolutely. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. <br /> UNGER: Yeah. Would the applicant come forward again, please? We all heard several <br /> testimony on the, on the wall and the traffic, the products, I guess. Please respond accordingly. <br /> FUKE: Sure. <br /> UNGER: Or if you would like to clarify. <br /> FUKE: Okay, first in the area of the traffic safety and the potential, like the blind spots, I'd like <br /> to kind of like note that the staff is aware of that and, as a result, has widely recommended <br /> Condition No. 8, which reads that all new driveway connections, etcetera, and access including <br /> the provision of adequate sight distances shall meet with the approval of Department of Public <br /> Works. Although this refers to new driveway connections, I believe that if the Commission so <br /> want, then this driveway connection can also apply to the existing driveway connection. And I <br /> think it would also behoove the applicant to make sure that there is adequate sight distance <br /> related to the, you know, to the existing driveway, if they're going to use it. Condition 8, you <br /> know, relates specifically to the new driveway connections, but my only recommendation, and <br /> maybe this is subject to the owner's approval, would be to expand this condition to include <br /> 9 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />