|
who are going to be resident, you are also inviting the other public to use access to it. So, you're
<br />having possibly a double or triple accessibility. Now, do you have a plan possibly to address this
<br />in the future to ensure that these residents have, you know, the, like parking, or whatever you,
<br />you know for this, for this residents. Not just shoving it down their throats here. I'm sorry,
<br />we're going to put this road through. You know, I'm, you know, we're not going to be
<br />responsible for it. I think you do need to be responsible, including planning. So, I'm hoping
<br />that, you know, this would be a consideration.
<br />YEE: Well, sir, I would say part of that process of public information is exactly this venue,
<br />right? And, the ability for what we're requiring in terms of notice to neighbors and stuff So,
<br />that public process of involving folks is part of this process. Clearly, yes, there is some
<br />assumptions Planning makes around connectivity and stuff, and we welcome the comments for
<br />what is best, okay? Again, without a proposal in front of us, we don't know what it is. A certain
<br />proposal for another development will demand a traffic study, right? And, so we get more
<br />details. Again, every project is a little different, but we do aim to try to get community
<br />engagement on every project. I just wanted to provide a little information to the public today.
<br />AGUINALDO: Mr. Chair, I have a question. Alex, can you go back to the slide where—the
<br />other one with the cul-de-sacs. Okay, right over here. Jeff and Alex, you see where RS -10 we
<br />have a cul-de-sac? Come down, right there. Is it possible because from hearing the testifiers,
<br />yes, they gotta comply with DPW, Engineering for all the roadway, all that, with the
<br />representative of the developer. Now, their concern is—for me, what if get one fire? Okay, can
<br />a fire truck—are they thinking the developer and representative thinking can they turn around?
<br />Can that fire truck turn around? How wide is the road? Have they thought about how wide is
<br />that road? Can, is it possible—it almost looks like one roundabout. If they do one, one cul-de-
<br />sac, you still like can, is it possible to stay like connect to that—not roundabout to that cul-de-
<br />sac? Because it's unknown for future, can we still like connect to that cul-de-sac later on. Why?
<br />Because I see their concern. People, even I go—if I go to somebody's place, you gotta reverse
<br />into their driveway because the developer and consultants only think about them for right now.
<br />Later on is later on. But, would that be possible? Have that been looked at?
<br />ROY: It wasn't specifically discussed, but
<br />AGUINALDO: We should because they already had a survey, survey plan.
<br />ROY: Yeah, but I'll remind that, Commissioner, that this right now is an existing dead end and
<br />has been dead end for some time, and this subdivision was created in 1974.
<br />AGUINALDO: Right.
<br />ROY: Long before we had the current rules and regulations guiding connectivity.
<br />AGUINALDO: Right, but is that a problem or can or cannot?
<br />ROY: Well, I would expect the people here if that's a problem, they would hopefully provide
<br />that information to us that right now living at the dead-end street—
<br />EXHIBIT A
<br />16
<br />
|