My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-07-11 Hearing Transcript - Charles Umemoto REZ 19-235
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2019
>
2019-07-11 Hearing Transcript - Charles Umemoto REZ 19-235
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2019 8:04:33 AM
Creation date
8/2/2019 8:04:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: Okay. <br />REPLOGLE: I'm not sure who would address this, but though the testimony, I kept hearing <br />about the active use of this park, and I think that's great, and parking, and I don't know if the <br />person developing this particular development is the same landowner of the rest of the three -acre <br />zoned ag parcels, and I realize the other subdivisions were built long ago. But, wouldn't it be <br />wise to create a parking area at that corner near the park that could also serve as the turnaround <br />for the fire trucks and ambulances? And, if that's a County easement, if I'm correct, that's the <br />lady's house on the corner by the park? On the left side. <br />LEE (from audience): So, we are right there. [Ms. Lee used the pointer to indicate where she <br />lives.] <br />REPLOGLE: Oh, you're there? <br />LEE (from audience): Yes. <br />REPLOGLE: Okay, well, there and the house below or above you, if there was a walking <br />easement through there that was maintained, then the people who go to the park that would be a <br />place and it could serve two purposes for the use of the fire truck. And, I realize I'm asking the <br />developer or the landowner to give up something, but they are going to have the advantage of <br />having a park within shouting distance. Anyway, that's my take. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Replogle, I'm not sure if that can work. Number one is it would <br />require an off-site easement that would have to be provided by other people to go through their <br />property to provide access to the park area. <br />REPLOGLE: That's not an easement with those dotted lines? <br />DARROW: No, it's not an easement, yeah. So, there— <br />REPLOGLE: Excuse me, just, I'm not contradicting you, but this lady said there was some <br />County easement there? <br />DARROW: She has this easement right here going through—you have a side easement, and <br />what is that easement for? It's <br />[Inaudible comments by Ms. Lee.] <br />DARROW: It's, yeah, there's a chance that could be a utility easement. <br />CLARKSON: Microphone, please. <br />LEE: All I can say is that my husband said it was County. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.