Laserfiche WebLink
around, and one is made for emergency vehicles to turn around. So, that'sI'm glad you <br />brought it up. I'm glad you brought it up. But, that is a concern from a safety and welfare issue. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you. <br />YOSHIZUML That's 900 that's what almost a quarter of a mile. <br />CLARKSON: Well, let me ask one further question that relates to this. The—there's a <br />condition about the proposed Mailani Street Extension. Now, this is a rezone. Isn't it possible <br />that, that if the Council or between the time the Commission sends, if we were to send a <br />favorable recommendation, that this subdivision map could completely change that the access <br />could be proposed from a different area and that the lot sizes and orientation could be completely <br />different than what is shown here as an illustration. Is that not true? <br />DARROW: The, I mean, anything could happen. I mean, even at this meeting. You folks can <br />say you know we don't want to see this access from Mailani, we want to see it from Kikaha, and <br />that could go up to Council. Highly unlikely because that's not the proposed layout for number <br />one, for the subdivision that's being proposed; number two, it doesn't make sense. What makes <br />sense in this particular layout is Mailani Extension. <br />In regards to, you know, the fire issue, that's—all of that is addressed, as Michael said, this is <br />like we're at a higher level, first thing we're dealing with is zoning. Is this appropriate to be <br />rezoned to residential in this area. When this comes down to the subdivision level, they have to <br />go through the drainage studies. They have to propose the layout that has to meet Fire Code in <br />regards to turnarounds, in regards to layout of the subdivision. They may ask them to put some <br />sort of turnaround at the end temporarily until there is connection in the future. I'm not sure if <br />that's what they'll do or not, or if they will say this is sufficient for us to back out. Again, I'm <br />just not sure, but we depend upon the expertise of these agencies as we go through the further <br />steps of providing the finished product. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you. Any further questions for any of the testifiers? If not, thank you. <br />Please be seated. Is there anyone else who wishes to testify on this matter today? If not, I'll ask <br />for a motion that public testimony be closed. <br />AU: Motion to close public testimony. <br />AGUINALDO: I second. <br />CLARKSON: All those in favor? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />CLARKSON: Opposed? Public testimony is closed. At this time, do we have any other <br />questions for staff or discussion? <br />REPLOGLE: Yes. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />18 <br />