Laserfiche WebLink
subsequent to the dismissal my case ... there are some changes <br />effected... without having to well I mean ... I guess I had some <br />leverage with the Public Works department... and they wanted me <br />to not ask certain questions... and if I would back off of asking <br />certain questions... they were willing to make some changes ... now <br />I had to give up asking some interesting questions but I got the <br />changes that I wanted in writing on a County letterhead and that <br />was sufficient to my purpose now at this moment in time I'm not <br />convinced that those changes is affected by a County letterhead are <br />still actually being implemented at the building counter ... and <br />ongoing for me and many many others problem that we're trying <br />to wrestle with and part of it involves this ... is the County <br />department becoming a consistent source of bad information ... now <br />property owners out here as far as planning and building go ... we <br />have investments in land ... some large some small but how we <br />handle our properties or investments effectively depends on <br />accurate information... so when Counties making up stuff ...false <br />stuff and basically saying ... oh this person just gets waived right <br />thru and this person gets forty-seven hurdles to jump over ... I mean <br />you know it's not an equal treatment under the law situation that <br />we have in this County... some of you may feel differently about <br />that but from the user end ... in the last several years things have <br />really gotten bad ... now when Nani Misaki was at the building <br />department... life was beautiful... very helpful... straight <br />forward... public servant ... was there to help you effect your <br />goals ... it's no longer the case ... now the goal is to ... well ... they act <br />like the code is some medieval Latin bible that needs to be <br />interpreted... and people like myself who can read English... don't <br />appreciate that... <br />Ms. Kahakalau: So I understand the ongoing dissatisfaction with in case what I'm <br />hearing specifically ... the building and ... that's not anything for us <br />to.... <br />Mr. Tucker: Right... right... so I'll cut it short. <br />Ms. Kahakalau: You know to agree on or disagree on but we hear you on that <br />part ... I think the question that Mr. Goodenow asked was in regards <br />to what was discussed this morning and your specific two main <br />points which had to do with... discovery issue and then as well the <br />cross-examination issue ... and our proposed efforts to review those <br />two very good points that you brought up ... as we continue to work <br />20 <br />