My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01-09-18 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2018
>
01-09-18 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2019 1:19:21 PM
Creation date
2/13/2018 4:04:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
we can make and we will work on the ones that we have expressed <br />today in regards to the code as you also stated it is a responsibility <br />of the Council but 1 think it would certainly again I appreciate your <br />suggestion here ... behoove us to be...at least informed as this is <br />happening and not just you know by chance we saw it in the <br />newspaper or something but that there could be some kind of a <br />communication from you know Counsel and Emily to us saying <br />the board is working on the code or you know something <br />something and if there are issues that came up at the Council <br />meeting that refer to the codes specifically that we can be kept in <br />the loop and if there is that opportunity to weigh in on adding you <br />know something to the code and I don't think anybody would <br />disagree with you that County. Council... any government <br />employees or any person period should be factual and honest and <br />truthful you know I mean that's the whole point of why we are <br />here ... that and if such a thing will be coming up in the code that <br />you know if there's a way for us to support it etc....I think I don't <br />see any reason why we would not want to do that so basically my <br />suggestion to both our Counsel and Emily would be to if that's <br />alright to just kind of keep us in the loop as Counsel is working on <br />the code and as I said I don't see any reason why we -would not be <br />supportive of your suggestion. <br />Mr. Tucker: It seems obvious... <br />Ms. Kahakalau: Yeah. <br />Mr. Tucker: Well I want to thank you each individually and for your time ... I <br />reserve the right to see how things proceed... and possibly will be <br />in a formal hearing someday ... hopefully not. <br />Ms. Kahakalau: Yes. <br />Mr. Goodenow: Thank you. <br />Ms. Kahakalau: Thank you very much. <br />Mr. Tucker: Dismissed? <br />Ms. Kahakalau: Yes ... thanks. <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: .So we have the respondent here ... I don't know if the board wanted <br />to ask the respondent if he had anything to say if not just to make <br />sure they have their right too. <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.