Laserfiche WebLink
.p <br />cause lava compositions on the ridge are highly fractionated, reflecting <br />shallow storage (Clagrrue et al., 1995). Whatever the cause, a major change <br />in the dynamics of Kilauea's magma supply system is needed to explain <br />the effusive -explosive cyclic behavior. <br />RELATION OF CALDERA TO CYCLES <br />Both explosive periods occurred when a deep caldera indented <br />Kilauea's summit. The Powers caldera existed during due time of depo- <br />sition of the Uwekahuna Ash (Powers, 1948: Holcomb, 1987) and only <br />began filling ca. 1000 CE, as estimated from the age of the oldest flow <br />overlying the Uwekahuna Ash south of the caldera (Fiske et al., 2009). <br />The modem caldera formed ca. 1500 CE, when the Kcanakako'i explo- <br />sive period started, and began to fill ca. 1500 CE (Swanson et al.. 2012x). <br />The phreatomagmatic and phreatic nature of most of the explosive erup- <br />tions suggest~ that the two calderas were often deep, at or below the water <br />table (Mastin, 1997; Mastin et al.. 2004). Today the water table is —615 m <br />below the highest point on the caldera rim, —490 m below the caldera <br />floor (Keller et al., 1979). We think it likely that parts of the floor were at <br />least that deep during the dominantly explosive periods. The water table is <br />unlikely to have been higher during the past few hundred years, to judge <br />from the presence of fresh basalt above, and altered basalt below, today's <br />water tabic (Hurwitz et al., 2002, 2003). <br />-The cause of caldera formation at Kilauea is uncertain. If the caldera <br />collapsed because a large volume of magma was rapidly erupted or in- <br />truded into the east rift zone, as conventionally thought (Holcomb et al., <br />1988), then why did the average magma supph? rate drop by almost two <br />orders of magnitude and stay low for centuries? No relatively shallow, <br />top-down process in the edifice is likely to cause such a long-term change <br />in behavior. <br />Recognition of eruption cycles at Klauca raises a new possibility. <br />Perhaps caldera formation results from reduction in magma supply to the <br />shallow storage reservoir, a term we use for a configuration of multiple <br />magma storage volumes (Fiske and Kinoshita, 1969; Dawson et al., 2004; <br />Baker and Amelung. 2012: Poland et al., 2014). If magma supply dropped <br />significaritly, eruptions or intrusions might deplete the shallow reservoir, <br />eventually leading to collapse of the overlying edifice. This bottom-up <br />model seems best suited to explain the linked formation of the caldera and <br />the ensuing decline in magma supply. <br />Before each explosive period, an effusive eruption took place that <br />could have depleted the storage reservoir if magma supply were low. Ex- <br />trusion of the 4-6 km' -Ail.`au flow field (Fig. 1) during an —60 yr period <br />(Clague et al., 1999) immediately preceded collapse of the modem calde- <br />ra. The Kpuka NEnE flow field (Fig. 1; Holcomb, 1987) covers more than <br />130 km' (extrapolating back to its summit source) on Kilauea's south flank <br />and immediately underlies the Uwekahuna Ash. Much of its volume could <br />have flowed into the ocean, given its coastline width of —7 km (Fig. 1). We <br />estimate that at least 0.5 km -'remains on land, and the total volume erupted <br />could be several times larger. <br />An alternative bottom-up model is that an increase in mantle melt- <br />ing rate supplied the large flow fields preceding caldera formation. The <br />increase could have depleted a relatively large volume of its melt compo- <br />nents, so that little magma was available to enter the volcano for several <br />centuries. <br />Both altematives are at odds with the ongoing eruption of Pu'u '0'6, <br />during which the supply rate has generally been —0.12 km' yr'except for <br />a temporary increase in 2003-2007 (Poland et al.. 2012). <br />MgO-RICH AND FRACTIONATED VITRIC TEPHRA <br />Small volumes of MgO-rich juvenile ash occur in both the <br />Uwekahuna Ash and Keanakiko`i tephra. Microprobe glass analyses <br />show that vitric ash with MgO to 1 I wt% occurs at several levels in the <br />Kcanak5ko'i tephra (Martin et al.. 2004: Table DR4), and one thin vitric <br />ash in the Uwekahuna Ash (Fiske et al.. 2009) contains MgO values of <br />GEOLOGY I July 2014 1 Aww.gsapubs.org <br />12.5 wt% (Table•DR5A; Helz et al., 2014). Such high MgO contents in <br />erupted melt etre unprecedented among summit lava flows at Kilauea; the <br />highest published amount in glass is 1.0.2 wt9'o (Helz et al., 2014). The <br />normal summit glass compositions (6-9 wt% MgO; Garcia et i:, 2003) <br />indicate storage in the shallow reservoir and crystallization of mainly oliv- <br />ine before eruption (Powers, 1955; Wright, 1971). <br />We think it significant that the highest MgO melts were erupted dur- <br />ing explosive, not effusive, periods. We interpret these high Mg0 values to <br />record brief or no storage in a disrupted shallow reservoir not fully recov- <br />ered following caldera collapse. Helz et al. (2014) reached a similar inter- <br />pretation for the Kulanaokuaiki tephra and for the much olderPahalaAsh. <br />The most highly fractionated compositions known at Kilauea's sum- <br />mit also occur in vitric tephra. For example, in the Keanakako'i tephra, <br />thin vitric ash just above layer 6 (McPhie et al., 1990. Swanson et al., <br />2012a) has only 4.0 wt% MgO and as much as 4.5 wt% TiO, and 1.0 <br />wt% K 2 0 (Table DR4). We interpret such unusual compositions to reflect <br />isolated storage and advanced fractionation of small pockets of magma <br />undisturbed by fresh, mantle -derived magma during low magma supply. <br />A marker bed in the Kulanaokuaiki tephra (unit 2 of Fiske et al., <br />20093 contains glass with unusually high values of TiO, (>3 wt%) and KO <br />(>0.7 wt%) for its moderately low Mg0 value (6.7 wtO1a; Table DR5B). A <br />temporally associated lava flow, one of two interbedded with the Kulana- <br />okuaiki tephra south of the caldera, has a similar composition (Wolfe and <br />Morris, 1996). This composition does not plot along the typical Kilauea <br />fractionation trend during effusive periods, although similar compositions <br />occur in lava flows earlier in Kilauea's history (Chen et al., 1996; Lipman <br />et al., 2006). <br />HAZARD INIPLICATIONS <br />Previous studies indicate that hazards of explosive eruptions at <br />Kilauea are substantial, including pyroclastic density currents as well as <br />tephra falls and ballistic showers (Decker and Christiansen, 1984; McPhie <br />et al., 1990; Dzurisin et al., 1995; Fiske et al., 2009; Swanson et al., 2012a, <br />2012b). Our work shows that the hazardous periods last much longer than <br />previously thought. When the next dominantly explosive period begins, <br />society may have to deal with centuries of repeated explosive activity at <br />Kilauea's summit. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />Recognition of' the explosive -effusive cycle raises far-reaching ques- <br />tions about the d-vnamics of Kilauea volcano. Rather than erupting lava <br />flows almost continuously, Kilauea is instead a more complex, modulated <br />system in which melting rate, supply rate, conduit stability (in both mantle <br />and crust), reservoir geometry, water table, and many other factors inter- <br />act. The explosive -effusive cycle is the net result of this interaction. Future <br />studies approaching Kilauea from a broad perspective are necessary to <br />significantly advance our understanding of one of Earth's most studied <br />volcanoes. Whether unrecognized explosive -effusive cycles occur on oth- <br />er basaltic volcanoes is a topic for future research: <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br />We thank Dave Clague, Dan Dzurisin, Shaul Hurwitz, and Pete Lipman for <br />insightful manuscript reviews. Tom Wright's comments on a preliminary version <br />were provocative. Dave Sherrod supplied three unpublished 1°C ages. Discussions <br />with Frank Trusdell were valuable. Robin Holcomb proposed eruptive cycles that <br />differ from ours but stimulated our thinking. Garcia and Mucek were supported by <br />National Science Foundation grant EAR -11 18741. This paper is School of Ocean <br />and Earth Science and'rechnology (SOEST) contribution 9115. <br />REFERENCES CITED' <br />Bakcr, S., and Amehmg, F., 2012, Top-down inflation and deflation at the summit <br />of Kilauea Volcano, Hawai'i observed with inSAR: Journal of Geophysical <br />Research, v. 117, B 12406, doi:10.1029/201IJB0f)9123. <br />Chen, C. -Y., Frev, F.A., Rhodes, J.M., and Easton, R.M., 1996, Temporal geo- <br />chemical evolution of Kilauea Volcano: Comparison of Hilina and Puna <br />Basalt, in Basu, A., and Hart, S., eds., Earth processes: Reading the isotopic <br />633 <br />