|
.p
<br />cause lava compositions on the ridge are highly fractionated, reflecting
<br />shallow storage (Clagrrue et al., 1995). Whatever the cause, a major change
<br />in the dynamics of Kilauea's magma supply system is needed to explain
<br />the effusive -explosive cyclic behavior.
<br />RELATION OF CALDERA TO CYCLES
<br />Both explosive periods occurred when a deep caldera indented
<br />Kilauea's summit. The Powers caldera existed during due time of depo-
<br />sition of the Uwekahuna Ash (Powers, 1948: Holcomb, 1987) and only
<br />began filling ca. 1000 CE, as estimated from the age of the oldest flow
<br />overlying the Uwekahuna Ash south of the caldera (Fiske et al., 2009).
<br />The modem caldera formed ca. 1500 CE, when the Kcanakako'i explo-
<br />sive period started, and began to fill ca. 1500 CE (Swanson et al.. 2012x).
<br />The phreatomagmatic and phreatic nature of most of the explosive erup-
<br />tions suggest~ that the two calderas were often deep, at or below the water
<br />table (Mastin, 1997; Mastin et al.. 2004). Today the water table is —615 m
<br />below the highest point on the caldera rim, —490 m below the caldera
<br />floor (Keller et al., 1979). We think it likely that parts of the floor were at
<br />least that deep during the dominantly explosive periods. The water table is
<br />unlikely to have been higher during the past few hundred years, to judge
<br />from the presence of fresh basalt above, and altered basalt below, today's
<br />water tabic (Hurwitz et al., 2002, 2003).
<br />-The cause of caldera formation at Kilauea is uncertain. If the caldera
<br />collapsed because a large volume of magma was rapidly erupted or in-
<br />truded into the east rift zone, as conventionally thought (Holcomb et al.,
<br />1988), then why did the average magma supph? rate drop by almost two
<br />orders of magnitude and stay low for centuries? No relatively shallow,
<br />top-down process in the edifice is likely to cause such a long-term change
<br />in behavior.
<br />Recognition of eruption cycles at Klauca raises a new possibility.
<br />Perhaps caldera formation results from reduction in magma supply to the
<br />shallow storage reservoir, a term we use for a configuration of multiple
<br />magma storage volumes (Fiske and Kinoshita, 1969; Dawson et al., 2004;
<br />Baker and Amelung. 2012: Poland et al., 2014). If magma supply dropped
<br />significaritly, eruptions or intrusions might deplete the shallow reservoir,
<br />eventually leading to collapse of the overlying edifice. This bottom-up
<br />model seems best suited to explain the linked formation of the caldera and
<br />the ensuing decline in magma supply.
<br />Before each explosive period, an effusive eruption took place that
<br />could have depleted the storage reservoir if magma supply were low. Ex-
<br />trusion of the 4-6 km' -Ail.`au flow field (Fig. 1) during an —60 yr period
<br />(Clague et al., 1999) immediately preceded collapse of the modem calde-
<br />ra. The Kpuka NEnE flow field (Fig. 1; Holcomb, 1987) covers more than
<br />130 km' (extrapolating back to its summit source) on Kilauea's south flank
<br />and immediately underlies the Uwekahuna Ash. Much of its volume could
<br />have flowed into the ocean, given its coastline width of —7 km (Fig. 1). We
<br />estimate that at least 0.5 km -'remains on land, and the total volume erupted
<br />could be several times larger.
<br />An alternative bottom-up model is that an increase in mantle melt-
<br />ing rate supplied the large flow fields preceding caldera formation. The
<br />increase could have depleted a relatively large volume of its melt compo-
<br />nents, so that little magma was available to enter the volcano for several
<br />centuries.
<br />Both altematives are at odds with the ongoing eruption of Pu'u '0'6,
<br />during which the supply rate has generally been —0.12 km' yr'except for
<br />a temporary increase in 2003-2007 (Poland et al.. 2012).
<br />MgO-RICH AND FRACTIONATED VITRIC TEPHRA
<br />Small volumes of MgO-rich juvenile ash occur in both the
<br />Uwekahuna Ash and Keanakiko`i tephra. Microprobe glass analyses
<br />show that vitric ash with MgO to 1 I wt% occurs at several levels in the
<br />Kcanak5ko'i tephra (Martin et al.. 2004: Table DR4), and one thin vitric
<br />ash in the Uwekahuna Ash (Fiske et al.. 2009) contains MgO values of
<br />GEOLOGY I July 2014 1 Aww.gsapubs.org
<br />12.5 wt% (Table•DR5A; Helz et al., 2014). Such high MgO contents in
<br />erupted melt etre unprecedented among summit lava flows at Kilauea; the
<br />highest published amount in glass is 1.0.2 wt9'o (Helz et al., 2014). The
<br />normal summit glass compositions (6-9 wt% MgO; Garcia et i:, 2003)
<br />indicate storage in the shallow reservoir and crystallization of mainly oliv-
<br />ine before eruption (Powers, 1955; Wright, 1971).
<br />We think it significant that the highest MgO melts were erupted dur-
<br />ing explosive, not effusive, periods. We interpret these high Mg0 values to
<br />record brief or no storage in a disrupted shallow reservoir not fully recov-
<br />ered following caldera collapse. Helz et al. (2014) reached a similar inter-
<br />pretation for the Kulanaokuaiki tephra and for the much olderPahalaAsh.
<br />The most highly fractionated compositions known at Kilauea's sum-
<br />mit also occur in vitric tephra. For example, in the Keanakako'i tephra,
<br />thin vitric ash just above layer 6 (McPhie et al., 1990. Swanson et al.,
<br />2012a) has only 4.0 wt% MgO and as much as 4.5 wt% TiO, and 1.0
<br />wt% K 2 0 (Table DR4). We interpret such unusual compositions to reflect
<br />isolated storage and advanced fractionation of small pockets of magma
<br />undisturbed by fresh, mantle -derived magma during low magma supply.
<br />A marker bed in the Kulanaokuaiki tephra (unit 2 of Fiske et al.,
<br />20093 contains glass with unusually high values of TiO, (>3 wt%) and KO
<br />(>0.7 wt%) for its moderately low Mg0 value (6.7 wtO1a; Table DR5B). A
<br />temporally associated lava flow, one of two interbedded with the Kulana-
<br />okuaiki tephra south of the caldera, has a similar composition (Wolfe and
<br />Morris, 1996). This composition does not plot along the typical Kilauea
<br />fractionation trend during effusive periods, although similar compositions
<br />occur in lava flows earlier in Kilauea's history (Chen et al., 1996; Lipman
<br />et al., 2006).
<br />HAZARD INIPLICATIONS
<br />Previous studies indicate that hazards of explosive eruptions at
<br />Kilauea are substantial, including pyroclastic density currents as well as
<br />tephra falls and ballistic showers (Decker and Christiansen, 1984; McPhie
<br />et al., 1990; Dzurisin et al., 1995; Fiske et al., 2009; Swanson et al., 2012a,
<br />2012b). Our work shows that the hazardous periods last much longer than
<br />previously thought. When the next dominantly explosive period begins,
<br />society may have to deal with centuries of repeated explosive activity at
<br />Kilauea's summit.
<br />CONCLUSIONS
<br />Recognition of' the explosive -effusive cycle raises far-reaching ques-
<br />tions about the d-vnamics of Kilauea volcano. Rather than erupting lava
<br />flows almost continuously, Kilauea is instead a more complex, modulated
<br />system in which melting rate, supply rate, conduit stability (in both mantle
<br />and crust), reservoir geometry, water table, and many other factors inter-
<br />act. The explosive -effusive cycle is the net result of this interaction. Future
<br />studies approaching Kilauea from a broad perspective are necessary to
<br />significantly advance our understanding of one of Earth's most studied
<br />volcanoes. Whether unrecognized explosive -effusive cycles occur on oth-
<br />er basaltic volcanoes is a topic for future research:
<br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
<br />We thank Dave Clague, Dan Dzurisin, Shaul Hurwitz, and Pete Lipman for
<br />insightful manuscript reviews. Tom Wright's comments on a preliminary version
<br />were provocative. Dave Sherrod supplied three unpublished 1°C ages. Discussions
<br />with Frank Trusdell were valuable. Robin Holcomb proposed eruptive cycles that
<br />differ from ours but stimulated our thinking. Garcia and Mucek were supported by
<br />National Science Foundation grant EAR -11 18741. This paper is School of Ocean
<br />and Earth Science and'rechnology (SOEST) contribution 9115.
<br />REFERENCES CITED'
<br />Bakcr, S., and Amehmg, F., 2012, Top-down inflation and deflation at the summit
<br />of Kilauea Volcano, Hawai'i observed with inSAR: Journal of Geophysical
<br />Research, v. 117, B 12406, doi:10.1029/201IJB0f)9123.
<br />Chen, C. -Y., Frev, F.A., Rhodes, J.M., and Easton, R.M., 1996, Temporal geo-
<br />chemical evolution of Kilauea Volcano: Comparison of Hilina and Puna
<br />Basalt, in Basu, A., and Hart, S., eds., Earth processes: Reading the isotopic
<br />633
<br />
|