My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-07-09 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2019
>
2019-07-09 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2019 8:44:05 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 8:44:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
clarified in response that unlike sign permit applications, which could advance through the <br /> permitting process in the Department of Public Works even with a negative recommendation from <br /> the Commission, design review requests stayed with the Planning Department where the applicant <br /> would be required to address Commission's concerns unless staff was told otherwise by the <br /> Planning Director. She agreed that a deferral would be a smoother process for the applicant and <br /> also for the Commission. <br /> Commissioner Sullenberger commented that the additional height to the peak of the mansard roof <br /> was not an issue to him, but that the issue seemed to be the raising of the roof fascia, or the eave. <br /> He said that lowering the roof fascia could bring back the appearance closer to the approved <br /> roofline, although that would decrease the area for the rooftop equipment and could also affect the <br /> roof access. He agreed Chairman Roth's earlier comment that keeping in the spirit of the roof <br /> pitch that the Commission had approved was important, particularly on the convenience store <br /> building, which was an entryway building. Chairman Roth recalled that the first overall approval <br /> had been a result of a lot of discussion about allowing a huge area of flat roof in exchange for nice <br /> slope roofs on buildings that were visible from the entryways. He opined that it would not be <br /> unreasonable to ask the applicant to stick to the tradeoff. Commissioner Hetherington reiterated <br /> that the original roofline seemed to provide enough space for the equipment. <br /> Commissioner Hetherington then moved to defer action and Commissioner Kern seconded the <br /> motion. <br /> Commissioner Sullenberger asked if the Commission should add conditions to the deferral. <br /> Chairman Roth noted that the owner's representatives had heard the entire discussion. He asked <br /> them if they had questions about the potential deferral. Mr. Knable responded that the discussion <br /> had been very helpful, and that they would appreciate the deferral. He said that Mr. Conte had <br /> also been listening to the discussion and they would consider the comments and present another <br /> plan for Commission's review. Commissioner Kern requested that there be one set of plans, and <br /> remarked that it had been very confusing having to look at multiple sets. Chairman Roth said that <br /> it would also be helpful to see an updated street corner view with the elevations in context. <br /> There being no further discussion on the motion, a roll call vote was taken and the motion carried <br /> with six ayes (Hetherington, Kern, Ching, Crusat, Ikeuchi and Sullenberger), no noes, and two <br /> absent and excused (Smith and Werchick). <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS <br /> None. <br /> ANNOUNCEMENTS <br /> Next meeting tentatively scheduled for July 23, 2019. <br /> Ms. Bugado announced that there were tentatively two applications on the meeting agenda for <br /> July 23, 2019. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.