Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Smith asked if Universal Signs had been involved with the last signs that had had <br /> to be taken down. The applicant, Chase Villafana, introduced himself, and answered that it had <br /> been a different sign company. He stated that Planet Fitness had initially been advised that as long <br /> as the sign size matched the Borders variance, it would be approved, and that since that had not <br /> been true, they were trying to comply with the code and not seek a variance. Commissioner Kern <br /> asked who had given them such advice. Mr. Villafana responded that he did not want to mention <br /> the names, but that they were local consultants and expediters that Plant Fitness had hired. He <br /> agreed with Commissioner Kern that they had been ill-advised. <br /> Commissioner Smith brought to Mr. Muro's attention that the last signs had not had an electrical <br /> permit for the illumination. Asked by Commissioner Smith, Mr. Muro stated on the record that <br /> the applicant would obtain an electrical permit in order to illuminate the signs. Also asked by <br /> Commissioner Smith, Mr. Villafana confirmed that the three existing banners would be taken <br /> down when the new signs were put up. <br /> Chairman Roth opened the floor for discussion. Commissioner Ikeuchi commented that she was <br /> displeased with the applicant's justification that just because something had been approved <br /> decades ago, it should be grandfathered in. She said that especially because she had not been on <br /> the Commission then, she could disregard comparison with the past sign and focus on what was <br /> before the Commission now. She then asked the other commissioners' opinion about light shining <br /> on the sign or the sign being backlit, instead of each letter being individually illuminated from the <br /> inside. Commissioner Ching responded that in his opinion the proposed lighting method would be <br /> more subtle and classier. He also said that he had been quite annoyed by their unpermitted signs <br /> and would have filed a complaint himself, if Commissioner Hetherington and Mr. Van Pernis had <br /> not done so, especially because the applicant had previously talked about it with the Commission <br /> at the initial design review meeting and therefore had been aware of the requirement for sign <br /> permit; however, after having been faced with considerable opposition from the community, they <br /> had acknowledged their mistake and had come back with a more presentable application in trying <br /> to get it right, and because of that the Commission should look at their merit. Chairman Roth, in <br /> response to Commissioner Ikeuchi's question about the lighting methods, said that it would be <br /> difficult to have light shining on the signs because the building was large with no eaves near them, <br /> that the lighting fixture could actually make the signs more distracting, and that the purple letters <br /> would not be so bright as white, even if they were lit from the inside. <br /> Commissioner Crusat inquired about two different shades of the letter color being presented. <br /> Mr. Muro confirmed that the purple color as shown on the presentation copy was the true color. <br /> Ms. Newlon added that the color on the Commissioners' copies appeared more like fuchsia due to <br /> color copy quality. <br /> Upon inquiry by Commissioner Ikeuchi, Mr. Villafana stated that the business was open 24 hours <br /> a day. Commissioner Sullenberger commented that while the other businesses in the same <br /> building were open only during normal business hours and therefore did not need their signs lit, <br /> illumination would serve Planet Fitness better because they were open in the evening. <br /> Commissioner Ikeuchi agreed that it mattered to the applicant to have signs illuminated during <br /> their business hours. <br /> 7 <br />