Laserfiche WebLink
BLNR—RFQ/RFP for Uncle Page 9 December 13, 2019 <br /> Billy's Lease <br /> consolidating and re-subdividing the parcels, safeguarding the <br /> convenience store operator, its employees and customers during <br /> renovation, addressing the parking and loading zone situation to the <br /> County's satisfaction, planning for sea level rise, as well as management, <br /> marketing, and financial plans for the subject property, and the extent to <br /> which the applicant's proposal meets the Department's development goals <br /> and objectives for the property. <br /> • Community Benefits. Any additional benefits arising from and unique to <br /> applicant's proposal that will benefit the community of Banyan Drive, <br /> Hilo, and Hawaii Island. <br /> • Financial Plan. The applicant's ability to fund/finance the applicant's <br /> proposed renovations and proposed operations. <br /> • Proposed Development Agreement and Lease: <br /> DLNR will negotiate a development agreement with the selected applicant. Staff <br /> anticipates the development agreement will include various obligations that must be <br /> satisfied by the selected applicant (obtaining all necessary permits, etc.), and that upon <br /> satisfaction of all such terms and conditions, the Board will issue a 65-year ground lease <br /> to the selected applicant to allow demolition, renovation, or partial demolition and partial <br /> renovation of the hotel. <br /> The development agreement may also address issues such as the selected applicant's <br /> obligations to construct or bond improvements and provisions that address the <br /> determination of the lease rent to be paid under the lease. <br /> • RFOs/RFPs for Two Banyan Drive Projects to Issue Simultaneously: <br /> Also before the Board at today's meeting is a request to issue an RFQ/RFP for another <br /> project at Banyan Drive—the former Country Club Condominium Hotel designated as <br /> Tax Map Key: (3) 2-1-005:020. Staff intends to issue the RFQs/RFPs for both projects <br /> separately but simultaneously, use the same response deadline for submissions for both <br /> projects and use the same review committees to evaluate the submissions and select the <br /> best proposals for each project. Although the RFQs/RFPs for the two projects will be <br /> moving forward on parallel tracks, submissions for each project will be evaluated <br /> independently from the other. In other words, the evaluation committee will recommend <br /> the highest offer/best proposal for each site to the Board for selection. <br /> Staff circulated a draft of this submittal to the State and County of Hawaii (COH) <br /> agencies listed in the table below with the results indicated: <br />