Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Roth: For the record, I just received this the other night. I think... <br /> Mr. Robinson: I know that this is not dated so. <br /> Mr. Roth: Yeah. <br /> Mr. Robinson: So if you were to date this, when would you date it? <br /> Mr. Roth: It was at 5:32 on Monday night. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Monday night. That would be... <br /> Ms. Sumner-Mack: I think we have to take some time. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: Of course. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Yeah. I think it was October 5? <br /> Mr. Roth: I think it was October 5th <br /> Mr. Robinson: October 5th, yeah. Okay. So in this...and we'll read this Mr. <br /> Kamelamela...said there would be...he didn't feel that there would <br /> be any conflict in...where he said in his short answer right on the <br /> first page...there does not seem to be an actual conflict of interest <br /> which would require your recusal. In addition to the circumstances <br /> probably do not fairly give rise to an appearance of impropriety <br /> and reasonably cast suspicion on your impartiality. So as to <br /> require recusal. Okay. And you fulfilled the disclosure and there's <br /> been discussion on the recusal. You know the trust in government <br /> issue...do you think that your prosecution of these cases, if it went <br /> forward, would have trust in government issues for... I mean <br /> some people will feel that way...some people will feel the other <br /> way. It's not black and white. You know what I mean? <br /> Mr. Roth: It really isn't black and white. I think if you would have asked me <br /> this question before the article was written, I hands down say no <br /> problem. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Right. <br /> Mr. Roth: Because people read only what they want to read in the papers. <br /> And the way the article was written...there's a perception that all <br /> the legal experts believe that it's a conflict. And that's what kind <br /> of got me here...is that. That perception that was created by the <br /> story. You know again, it's kind of interesting that one of those <br /> legal experts is saying...well there's not really any law that's being <br /> 27 <br />