My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-12-11 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-12-11 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2020 4:14:31 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 1:07:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
further discussion on that? If not, all those in favor say aye. <br /> Contrary minded. Okay at this point we'll move to executive <br /> session. We'd like to ask everyone to leave and just wait and we'll <br /> call you back in when we're through. <br /> Motion and Vote: Mr. Wiseman moved to go into executive session to resume discussion. <br /> Ms. Sumner-Mack seconded the motion. All members voted aye. <br /> 10:12 a.m. The Board moved into executive session. <br /> * <br /> 11:06 a.m. The Board returned into regular session. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay we'll go back into regular session. And we're still on item <br /> c., which we moved up under unfinished business and that was <br /> regarding a Petition 2019-07. Is there any further discussion? Or a <br /> motion? Is there a motion regarding this matter? <br /> Mr. Wiseman: I'll make a motion. I move that the Board find no conflict of <br /> interest, pursuant to the Code of Ethics. And I further move that <br /> the...based on the testimony received...and other factors that in <br /> the interest of prudence...and maintaining the public's confidence <br /> in the system of our Government, that Mr. Roth established a wall <br /> or barrier within his office. And he will not handle any cases, <br /> administratively or otherwise with respect to any prosecutions <br /> involving the persons that may be at issue here. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay, there's a motion before the Board. Is there a second? Is <br /> there a second to that motion? <br /> Mr. Heintz: I will second that motion,just so that we can act on it. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay. So it's been moved and it's been seconded that we find that <br /> there is no conflict of interest. That Mr. Roth will establish within <br /> his office, a barrier, to allow the prosecution of these cases to go <br /> forward by the County Prosecuting Attorney. However without <br /> Mr. Roth's direct involvement in those cases. Is that a correct <br /> summation? <br /> Mr. Wiseman: Direct or indirect. Any involvement. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Any involvement whatsoever. <br /> Ms. Sumner-Mack: I would be in favor or of this with change of wording from wall to <br /> barrier. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay so instead of a wall, we would say barrier? <br /> 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.