Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Wiseman: Yeah. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: That's fine with me. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay. So moved and seconded. Movement by Judge Wiseman, <br /> seconded by Larry. Discussion? Regarding this matter? Before <br /> the vote? <br /> Mr. Heintz: I believe our motion should also involve or talk about appearance <br /> of conflict of interest. Which I believe the record shows that there <br /> isn't an appearance either. But if Board doesn't...inclined to do <br /> that...I will simply file a dissenting opinion which will address that <br /> part of the question. And Mr. Roth asked that we address that as <br /> well. <br /> Ms. Sumner-Mack: I think we'd already mentioned that wording could be further <br /> discussed and worked out. So perhaps that could be addressed at <br /> that point but otherwise I think the motion should be voted on. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: We're gonna see a draft. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Correct. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: Have that first and then we can... <br /> Mr. Robinson: Correct. We'll have a draft of the informal advisory opinion that <br /> will be circulated. We'll have the opportunity at that point to <br /> insert anything into it that we would like to insure that is addressed <br /> in that informal advisory opinion. And if we do not address what <br /> someone feels or they want to file a dissenting opinion, they can do <br /> that as well. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: There's also a concurring opinion. Concur but you can register <br /> your dissent. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Correct. <br /> Mr. Heintz: Thank you Mr. Chairman. <br /> Mr. Robinson: So is there any further discussion then? So the motion is that we <br /> find no conflict of interest based on testimony that we heard prior. <br /> That with the respect to Mr. Roth's construction of a barrier within <br /> his office. That there would be so he would have no direct or <br /> 26 <br />