Laserfiche WebLink
with a condition, but I wanted to put it on the record since this is a rezone going to the County <br />Council, and essentially, it's just the old language which is speaking to the old site plan. The <br />new language is speaking to the new site plan. That's all. <br />So, in terms of the roadway improvement issue, Exhibit 3 of the Background Report is a letter <br />from the Department of Public Works. It's our understanding based on conversations with them <br />that their standard, their roadway improvement standards for commercial zoning are full curb, <br />gutter, sidewalk along the entirety of the frontage of the property. We did speak with them after <br />conversations with the Applicant to see if there was flexibility from that, if there was a way that <br />we could craft something different understanding that maybe it doesn't necessarily fit the <br />character of the area. Based on our conversations, we were told that that is their standard, and <br />they are going to stick to that standard. Based on that information, I passed it on to the Director, <br />and he agreed that we would keep our proposed condition. <br />We do have Bryce Harada here from DPW if you have specific questions for the Engineering <br />Division who produced that comment letter. However, that's kind of how we got here with that, <br />and you obviously as a Commission have the opportunity to craft new condition language and <br />certainly up at County Council, they have the opportunity to change that condition as well. <br />CLARKSON: Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't we in the past on other rezones where <br />the same standard condition was proposed by Public Works, defer the actual construction of <br />curb, gutter, sidewalk and simply require that the landowner commit to their pro -rata share of the <br />cost of such construction once there was a determination that a long stretch of road would <br />actually be improved in that regard. Our original concern was you go from curb, gutter, <br />sidewalk to no curb, gutter, sidewalk to curb, gutter, sidewalk to no curb, gutter, sidewalk. <br />KAY: Sure. <br />CLARKSON: And, that really a whole section of road should be done all at one time rather than <br />piecemeal and that the funding for that all at one time should come from the landowners fronting <br />that road, but not be required necessarily immediately. <br />KAY: You are correct. In the past, we have done that, and there have been discussions about <br />that. Again, based on the conversations that I had yesterday with Public Works, we were told <br />that that was the standard and that's what we werethat's, they were sticking with that <br />recommendation. Again, should you as a Commission want to propose different language or <br />have us come up with some different language, that would then go up to County Council, that's <br />certainly your right. <br />AU: Mr. Chair? Question. <br />CLARKSON: Yes. <br />AU: Can I call Bryce over? Sorry, I didn't get your last name. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />