DLNR Testimony - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

authorized under this measure may lead to a sense of entitlement amongst lessees that can result and has resulted in the sale of public lands, including "ceded" lands to which Native Hawaiians have never relinquished their claims. OHA objects to the sale or alienation of"ceded" lands except in limited circumstances, and has significant concerns over any proposal that may facilitate the diminution of the "ceded" lands corpus. Accordingly, should the Committee choose to move this measure forward, OHA strongly recommends amendments to protect against the creation of extremely long-term leasehold interests and the issuance, renewal, or renegotiation of other lease terms that may compromise the state's fiduciary obligations to Native Hawaiians and the public. To this end, OHA respectfully offers language to ensure that any redevelopment district planning committee follows the general public land lease safeguards found in HRS § 171-36, unless and until a redevelopment committee adopts, in the transparent chapter 91 rulemaking process, administrative rules to specifically replace the provisions in HRS § 171-36: By amending page 9, lines 8-13, to read as follows: "(4) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, lease public lands in a designated district and renew or renegotiate any lease in connection with any project contained in the redevelopment plan for the designated district, on terms and conditions pursuant to section 171-E and consistent with the redevelopment plan, provided that any new, renewed, or renegotiated leases shall be subject to the terms, conditions, and restrictions found in section 171-36 for the leasing of public lands, unless otherwise specifically provided in administrative rules adopted pursuant to chapter 91." 2. Redevelopment district and redevelopment area revenues should account for the constitutional shares of OHA and DHHL. While OHA appreciates the apparent intent to have some portion of redevelopment district revenues to be recommitted to the activities of the district, OHA does express concern regarding language that may inadvertently fail to account for the percentage of revenues from certain public lands that must be set aside for transfer to OHA and DHHL. Specifically, the allocation of fifty percent of redevelopment district public land revenues into redevelopment district revolving funds, "notwithstanding section 171-19," may result in the failure to account for the shares of OHA and DHHL under the public land trust and Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, as specifically noted in that section. Similar language in this measure regarding revenues specifically generated from public lands in the Waiakea peninsula redevelopment district also raises the same concerns. Moreover, absent express statutory notice, this measure's contemplated authorization of county-based local redevelopment agencies to negotiate development agreements for state-held public lands could also result in negotiated agreements that fail to account for OHA's and DHHL's shares. Accordingly, OHA respectfully urges amendments that would provide explicit statutory acknowledgement and notice to redevelopment district and redevelopment area decisionmakers and