DLNR Testimony - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

participants, regarding the need to account for OHA's and DHHL's share of certain public land revenues: By amending page 15, lines 3-5, to read as follows: "(1) Notwithstanding section 171-19, and subject to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920, as amended, and section 5(f) of the Admission Act of 1959, fifty per cent of the revenues, income, and receipts of the department from the public lands in the designated district;" By amending page 17, line 6, to read as follows: "(1) Subject to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920, as amended, and section 5(f) of the Admission Act of 1959, fifty per cent of the revenues, income, and receipts" And by amending the language found on page 27, lines 8-10, to read as follows: "(1) Describe the land subject to the development agreement, including the location, area, and size of the land, and whether the land is subject to section 5(f) of the Admission Act of 1959 or section 1 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920, as amended;" 3. Rent reductions or waivers for public land leases that require the removal of improvements should be applied only after the set aside of the amounts to which OHA and DHHL may be entitled, and rent reductions or waivers for the provision of infrastructure should be commensurate with the equity in such improvements to be recaptured by the state. Finally, OHA appreciates this measure's intent to provide the Board of Land and Natural Resources with flexibility in adjusting or waiving lease rent, based on a lessee's investments in removing old improvements or installing basic infrastructure. However, OHA notes that reductions in rent to facilitate the removal of old or dilapidated improvements that the state, as a prudent landowner and fiduciary, should have required of previous lessees, should not diminish public land revenue amounts to which OHA or DHHL would be otherwise entitled. As noted above, the state holds specific fiduciary obligations in its administration of lands, including public trust lands and "ceded" lands, with Native Hawaiians and the public as specifically named beneficiary classes. A failure on the state's part to apply basic principles of due diligence and prudence in requiring previous lessees to remove old and unwanted improvements should not be used to reduce the benefits that would otherwise be realized by its beneficiaries. Accordingly, OHA respectfully requests amendments that ensure that any reduction or waiver in rent for lessee's removal of improvements take place only after the set aside of amounts to which OHA and DHHL may be entitled. In addition, OHA notes that in some instances, rent reductions or waivers of up to 20 years may approach or exceed the useful life of certain types of infrastructure installed by lessees. In such cases, the full benefit of such infrastructure would be realized by lessees, with little to no equity left