Laserfiche WebLink
CARR SMITH: I guess, based on the CRC letter again, and then based on the County's response <br /> to that, it sounded like the archaeological data recovery plan has been done, or? <br /> RECHTMAN: So,the archaeological data recovery—is this [mic]working?—data recovery <br /> plan has not been completed yet. You can ask about it the others, or I can just . The <br /> archaeological inventory survey has been completed. The cultural impact assessment was <br /> completed. The plans for preservation, mitigation, and burial treatment, while that came up in <br /> the Cultural Resources Commission meeting, we had a subsequent meeting after that, that <br /> meeting with them, and we had meetings with the Planning Director about at what point in the <br /> process would these plans be completed. And we had a, I don't know if we call it an agreement, <br /> but we had an understanding that we would begin the consultation phases of the data recovery <br /> plan, the preservation plan, the burial treatment plan, but the plan themselves would not have to <br /> be completed or submitted until prior to, you know, final subdivision or ground altering <br /> activities. <br /> MOOERS: I think one of the things that always comes up is that it's very difficult to prepare <br /> specific plans until we have an agreement with the County that we are going to have five-acre <br /> lots, and then you are going to agree with this proposal that we have, you know. Once that's <br /> agreed to, then we can finalize those plans, and they have to be approved by not only the State <br /> Historic Preservation Division but also the Planning Department, and they'll do that in <br /> consultation with the CRC. So, it's really, very difficult for us to go beyond this point with the <br /> plans until we have an understanding that they are going to be six lots, and we are not going to <br /> build anything makai of the trail. <br /> I did want to bring up one thing and I forgot. You asked about the preservation of the trail. We <br /> are working with the Ala Kahakai people, and they are saying that this alignment of the trail <br /> would probably be the Ala Kahakai trail as [inaudible] here. The owner is completely <br /> committed to working with Na Ala Hele and Ala Kahakai to confirm the alignment and have that <br /> be the pedestrian access across the property. <br /> RECHTMAN: Sort of a case in point is when this was a nine-lot subdivision, the level of <br /> preservation versus data recovery was extremely different than it is for a six-lot subdivision. So, <br /> if I had a nine-lot subdivision, the requirement would have been, get your data recovery and <br /> preservation plans in place; when we morph it to do a six-lot, those will all change. So, for <br /> example, everything, this is the same, everything in green on this map was preservation at the <br /> nine-lot subdivision configuration, and then when we switched to a six-lot subdivision <br /> configuration, we were able to put in all these other yellow sites here are now in preservation, <br /> which would have otherwise been data recovery sites. So, once we get the approvals and we <br /> know where we are going and we know which roads, you know, driveways and everything else, <br /> then we know we can, you know, maximize the preservation sites that way. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />