My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh D (AMEND REZ 2004-024 & AMEND REZ 2004-025)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-20 Leeward Exh D (AMEND REZ 2004-024 & AMEND REZ 2004-025)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2020 5:45:00 PM
Creation date
6/18/2020 5:44:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VAN PERNIS: When they originally obtained their approval, they got valuable zoning for this <br /> and the master planned area, and they are now, in exchange for the promises, they are now <br /> asking to waive, right? <br /> KAY: There are a few conditions of approval that they are asking to waive that were based on <br /> representations made back then around affordable housing, timing of housing relative to <br /> commercial development and the like, and have provided their justification for that in their <br /> application. <br /> VAN PERNIS: And, have they offered to give anything back from the valuable rezoning they <br /> obtained in 2004 and 2005? <br /> KAY: Not that we've seen. Most of the conditions have been either asking for cleaning up <br /> conditions that have already been complied with or asking for relief from conditions of approval <br /> that were required them to do something, in addition to what's already on the books in terms of <br /> County requirements. <br /> VAN PERNIS: So they get the valuable upzoning, but there is no, their promises are not kept, <br /> and they are looking to eliminate many of them. <br /> KAY: I will let the applicant address that. <br /> CARR SMITH: Any other questions? <br /> VAN PERNIS: Yes, I have several more. Is Mr. Schuler behind all of this development in the <br /> area, these LLCs and Pualani Makai, generally speaking? <br /> CARR SMITH: Let's let the applicant <br /> VAN PERNIS: Well, I'm asking if the County investigated and tied these applications in with <br /> those of Pualani Makai. <br /> KAY: So, Mr. Schuler is the only managing member that DCCA provided for Puaa <br /> Development, and as we stated before, Puaa Development is the only managing member for <br /> Suffolk Investment, so there does seem to be a connection. <br /> VAN PERNIS: And in regards to the five-acre school lot, has the Planning Department <br /> investigated whether or not Holualoa School, which is in the district, has any space for additional <br /> students? <br /> KAY: It's our understanding that a tentative subdivision approval was granted for a five-acre <br /> school site, but again, according to our background report, because the development of the <br /> school was tied to infrastructure improvements that have not taken place yet,that site was <br /> abandoned essentially, and the school went further makai of the project site. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Where is another school? <br /> 9 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.