My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-05-27 Meeting Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
2020-05-27 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 10:13:38 AM
Creation date
6/25/2020 10:09:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />modifications due to State Historic Preservation Division and other delays. The <br />Nāālehu EA is in progress. ʻ <br /> <br /> At this time, Chair Pequeño allowed Sandra Demoruelle to testify on this agenda item. <br /> <br /> Ms. Demoruelle: She has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the adequacy of the <br />environmental assessment and the finding of no significant impact. The county ignored over <br />900 pages of comments, which are in a whole separate volume. None of the information <br />provided in the EA is substantiated by scientific information. The waste flow volume of 190,000 <br />gallons is pulled out of the air with nothing to substantiate it. She is now in litigation and <br />settlement negotiations so cannot talk about it, but she wants them to know both projects are <br />under litigation. She is suing the EPA for the lack of an EIS provided under NEPA. If need be, <br />she will file under the state if that is what is required to force the county directly to do an <br />adequate environmental review. Anyone who looks at this can see for themselves it is highly <br />controversial as to flow volume and flooding in the area, and as to whether an industrial <br />wastewater treatment plant is even needed. The septic conversion for the third project, for the <br />Pāhala seniors, went for $410,000. Now they have almost $10 million available just for the <br />design of the Nāālehu project. She would point to the CIP budget and enormous numbers ʻ <br />there just for design. These folks are going crazy with spending money on Brown and Caldwell, <br />and they need to be stopped. That is why she has filed suit. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Cardwell asked Ms. Demoruelle for clarification on whether she had filed <br />a lawsuit regarding both plants. Ms. Demoruelle said yes, because what triggers the NEPA was <br />the grant that had been given by EPA, which is still in effect. The grant was awarded for one <br />project, the Nāālehu and Pāhala Villages Large Capacity Cesspool Conversion Project. In 2011 it ʻ <br />got divided into two projects, and somewhere along the line it got changed from doing a simple <br />septic conversion to expensive industrial capacity wastewater treatment plants. She withdrew <br />her original lawsuit as it was premature. In May 2019 the EPA and county changed the grant <br />over from Nāālehu to Pāhala, changing coursesʻ again. That is the nature of the lawsuit, which <br />anyone can look up online. <br /> <br /> Chair Pequeño continued with Director Kucharski’s informal updates. <br /> <br />(2) Status of the Kealakehe Wastewater Treatment Plant R-1 Upgrade Project: The <br />design is on hold pending the Supreme Court decision and its impact. The R-1 <br />plant has an additional design to expand recycle quantity from Qfrom 1.8 mgd <br />R <br />to 3.6 mgd. There is a design contract being reestablished for the North and <br />South Q distribution pipelines. The EIS effort is ongoing. The Archeological <br />R <br />Inventory Survey was completed and submitted to SHPD on May 20, 2020, and <br />SHPD is expected to take potentially one year to review and accept the AIS. The <br />EIS is to be completed three months after SHPD approval of the AIS. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Fulton said that although the laterals that feed into the Aliʻi Drive sewer <br />line are technically not the purview of the county, they can be a source of leaks, infiltration, and <br />exfiltration. There is a significant algae bloom going on in Kailua Bay, and there is an aerial <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.