My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-11 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2020
>
2020-02-11 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2020 8:36:59 AM
Creation date
7/2/2020 8:36:50 AM
Metadata
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The applicant addresses Chairman Roth regarding an amendment to the agenda. Ms. Newlon recommends all <br /> rectifications to be made during the applicant's presentation or in the plan approval phase. <br /> Ms. Newlon commenced her PowerPoint presentation for the proposed revisions for the Henry Street Hotel. She <br /> used slides to help orient the commission as to where the subject parcel is situated. <br /> Slide 2- Subdivision map no. 7789-r, subject parcel, lot 1-A with access and utility easement off Henry Street. <br /> Slide 3 —Tax map indicating the location of the project parcel 6 <br /> Slide 4 - A letter from the design review by KVDC first held on August 15, 2017, whereby the KVDC voted to <br /> defer action with recommendations made to address concerns and to return for another meeting. KVDC held a <br /> second meeting on 9/19/2017 for a revised design, and the KVDC unanimously voted to recommend approval of <br /> the proposed project with; 1) any white color to be changed to almond, and; 2) for the stucco treatment, as shown <br /> on sheet A-5.1, to be changed from driftwood to cotton. The submittal following the recommendation letter dated <br /> 10/4/2017 was consistent with recommendations as cited above and reflected in the approved Final Plan Approval <br /> on 1/11/2018. <br /> Slide 5 —The agenda required rectifications according to the submittal from the applicant. Revisions include; 1) <br /> 140 rooms reduced to 128 (48 rooms with kitchens, and 80 rooms without); 2) reserve an area for a potential <br /> second phase to include up to 18 apartments; 3)reduce the proposed parking with the intent to provide a minimum <br /> of 128 stalls; 4) reduce the size and height of the Mauka Wing by one floor. The landscaping, materials, and <br /> orientation of the Makai Wing would remain unaltered. <br /> Slide 6—Displays the exterior elevation submitted for this design review and includes the colors of the proposed <br /> Henry Street Hotel that are an amendment request to the previously approved color scheme: <br /> 1) Siding—changed back to driftwood, from already approved recommendation to cotton. <br /> 2) Any color or white previously changed to cotton; now trim is shown as Patina Green. <br /> 3) Doors previously shown as almond, now shown as bronze. <br /> 4) Windows previously shown as almond, now shown as bronze. <br /> Slide 7 & 8—Displays the reserved area for future changes to the design footprint for phase two in the northeast <br /> corner of the parcel. <br /> Slide 9 & 10—Floor plans level 1 —4. <br /> Slide 11 —Rooftop plans. <br /> Slide 12 & 13—Exterior elevations. <br /> Commissioner Ching questions, "What part of the hotel,if any, will be seen from Queen K?"Ms.Newlon depicts <br /> the black and white photocopies of the original photographs provided with the application. Due to the poor quality <br /> of the copies,it was yet unclear as to what would be seen. Chairman Roth notes prior review of the plans, and with <br /> landscaping and the drop in elevation, the commissioners determined not much of the building would be seen. <br /> Commissioner Kern also mentioned on page A-3.1, the north, south, east, and west orientations may give some <br /> thought and clarification to the question. <br /> Commissioner Ikeuchi queries regarding the reserved area and presumes another meeting for phase two of the <br /> plan. Ms. Newlon confirms and goes on to explain for future developments; the developer can show a footprint, <br /> including a parking area, or set aside a reserved space on the parcel. Regardless, the developer will need to return <br /> for further design review for the potential phase two. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.