2020-02-11 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes

Home

Chairman Roth called upon the applicant, and architect, Fritz Harris-Glade. He provided the commission with the original hotel design from 2 �/z years prior. Mr. Harris-Glade then addressed commissioner Ching's previous question. He explains the 35-foot difference in elevation along with the reduction of the Mauka Wing, and where one is situated on the highway, will determine how much and what part of the building will be seen. He then proceeds on to explain the reasoning for the proposed changes. Originally the hotel was built with a generic footprint, and after much research and consideration with different hotel brands, they selected to go with the Marriott design. Marriott's design standards require that Mr. Harris-Glade complies with their design guidelines. The developer's decision to keep the concept, but reduce the hotel in size, was realized due to the economy. The reduction in size provides the hotel with more than enough water presently needed, giving the owner's the opportunity for future expansion. Mr. Harris-Glade offered a potential phase two footprint to include up to 18 apartments, with provided parking for the units. He goes on to explain the amendment request for the previously approved exterior design since the manufacturer discontinued the initially approved colors(a lighter color for most of the building and a darker shade to give depth). Another significant change is to the roof. Instead of a Mansard rooftop, various roof pods will be used to break up the visual effect. Commissioner Ikeuchi inquires as to whether the apartments would be sold as timeshare or at market rate. As of then, Mr. Harris-Glade did not know and countered that was not up for discussion at that time. As stated on the agenda, he was required to show the use of the reserved area for a potential second phase to include up to 18 apartments. Commissioner Hetherington asked for clarification on the building's exterior. Mr. Harris-Glade confirmed what looks to be cement blocks are hard shingles, and the white portions of the building are stucco. He presents the commission with color chips for the requested exterior color scheme amendment: 1) Patina or Parkway Green for the roof, 2) Changing the color of the wood trim from white to Patina Green 3) Dover Sky for the light stucco; 4) Spectrum Brown for the contrasting stucco. Chairman Roth requested that Mr. Harris-Glade elaborate on what necessitated the roof change from Mansard to individual roof pods. Mr. Harris-Glade's response was, according to Marriott's design guidelines, there should be no visible rooftop. His purpose for the roof pods was to give balance and character to the building while making it visually attractive, with functionality. The three makai roof pods would become premium rooms with high ceilings, and the mauka roof pods will be utilized to camouflage roof equipment. Commissioner Ching addresses his concerns regarding the exterior color scheme amendment. He informs Mr. Harris-Glade to be aware that the exterior colors approved by the commission are the colors that must be used for the project unless an amended proposal is approved. Mr. Harris-Glade recommended doing a swatch of the approved colors before the final color coat is applied to be sure the color scheme is appealing. Mr. Harris-Glade's concept is to achieve a light and dark shade for visual break-up. There were a few rectifications made by Commissioner Ching regarding the location of the lot. His concern is for the proposal to be accurate, and the wording correct, so the project approved corresponds with the plan. Mr. Harris-Glade concurs. He then reiterates that the owners intend on providing 128 parking stalls; I stall per room. There being no more questions for Mr. Harris-Glade, Chairman Roth opens the floor for discussion. He counsels the commission to consider phase two as a future development, and not up for review at that time. Moving on to the exterior color scheme, the commission agrees to; 1)Dover Sky for the light stucco; 2) Spectrum Brown for the contrasting stucco. The next item up for discussion is the reduction in size. Chairman Roth notes considering the original scope of the project was previously approved, and it would be hard to argue against a reduction in size. The third item Chairman brings up for discussion is the significant change to the roof. The commissioners feel the fact that the roof pods are utilized to camouflage equipment is an attractive idea.