|
RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Mr. Imagire. Any other further discussion from the board, the
<br /> Commission? There is no further discussion. Staff, would you please do the roll call vote?
<br /> ANDREWS: Yes, we, I want to make sureI see a hand raised. I'm sorry, I don't want to
<br /> jumpI see Commissioner Replogle.
<br /> REPLOGLE: I want to make sure I know what I'm voting for.
<br /> ANDREWS: Okay, I'm going to verify that as well. Commissioner Clarkson has moved and
<br /> then to make sure that I'm confirming that I heard this right that you want to approve the
<br /> application with future conditions to be added. Is that correct?
<br /> CLARKSON: That's correct, with the future conditions to be added after a continuance to have
<br /> those conditions, but my motion for approval does include conditions that would affect my vote
<br /> for approval. So, even though there will be a lot of conditions that are, I don't want to say pro
<br /> forma standard conditions having to do with time limits and other issues that would go with any
<br /> other Special Permit approval. I do want to make sure that conditions about the driveway, and
<br /> I'll be willing to reconsider that further, but as of now,that there be a single driveway, that the
<br /> parking area be screened from the street, and that there be no signage other than the location and
<br /> the names of the owners as typical for a single-family residence, and that all the
<br /> customers/clients be, come to the property by appointment only. Those were the four conditions
<br /> that I see as being important for my motion, in my vote for approval of the Special Permit, and
<br /> the reasons for those conditions, as our counsel has asked for, is to make sure that even though
<br /> this is not a permit for a home occupation, that it be "—"to a, having the appearance of a home
<br /> occupation under the permit.
<br /> ANDREWS: Commissioner Au is raising his hand.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Commissioner Au, go ahead.
<br /> AU: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I believe what we need to dosorry, can you guys hear me, okay?
<br /> So, Malia, you can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think what we need to do is we need to number
<br /> one, approve the Special Permit. That's the first thing we need to do. The second thing we need
<br /> to do is we need to make a second motion to add conditions with the findings of facts, conclusion
<br /> of law. Is that correct, Malia? Is that what we need to do?
<br /> HALL: That's correct, but I think the one thing that is giving me pause is the fact that
<br /> Commissioner Clarkson is saying his approval is based on these conditions, and if his conditions
<br /> are contrary to the Fire Code, then we have an issue, right? So, I think that if instead those, these
<br /> conditions are worded to where, you know, instead of they have to have this one, one driveway
<br /> and all that kind of stuff, I think it needs to be more to the language of like it needs to—if it's
<br /> consistent, you know, one driveway, if it's consistent with the Fire Code. I think that would be
<br /> more acceptable. If not, we could have a, you know, you guys want these four conditions and
<br /> then we add a couple more conditions next week, I mean next month, and it could be a little
<br /> messy, so, yes you guys can do it that way procedurally. You can approve the permit now, and
<br /> EXHIBIT A
<br /> 21
<br />
|