|
then adopt conditions later, but you guys are now approving with conditions and then adding
<br /> conditions. I don't know, I think you guys gotta choose one. You either approve the permit as is
<br /> and then add conditions next month or continue to add the conditions and then approve next
<br /> month. So,those, I think are the cleaner options.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Mr. Au?
<br /> AU: What I recommend, Commissioner Clarkson, is maybe you just, we just approve, a motion
<br /> to approve a Special Permit and state your reasons, and then we make another motion, somebody
<br /> on the board, on the Commission make another motion, and we'll let the Applicant and the
<br /> Planning Department hash out the conditions, and then, when it gets brought to us at the next
<br /> meeting, if we chose to, Commissioner Clarkson, we can amend certain conditions. I think it
<br /> might be cleaner that way, and I did see Director Yee raise his hand, and Malia, can you chime
<br /> in?
<br /> CLARKSON: Let me, let me just speak to that please as the person who made the motion. I'm
<br /> perfectly okay with that. I just wanted to make sure staff, we're going to have to approve, if this
<br /> motion to approve the permit passes, at a subsequent meeting, we're going to have to approve the
<br /> findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decision and order so that, and that would be at a later
<br /> meeting. We can always hash out the, whether or not the conditions that are presented to us at
<br /> that time, are sufficient for our continued approval, but I, so I just wanted to make sure that
<br /> everybody understood when those findings of fact and conclusions of law and the decision was
<br /> written up that these were important to me, and if they were not "—"in those findings, that I
<br /> would be unlikely to approve them. So, I'm willing to let it slide until the next meeting or
<br /> whatever meeting we consider and just go for a straight up/down vote now. But,please be aware
<br /> that my only motivation for moving for approval is based on conditions that make this look like a
<br /> home occupation.
<br /> RAFFIPY: Thank you. Mr. Kern, you have anything to contribute to the Commission's
<br /> discussion?
<br /> KERN: Yeah, yeah thank you, Mr. Chair. Procedurally wise, I think we're, you know, either
<br /> way is fine. I think the Applicant is agreeable with those four conditions, with the only
<br /> exception just making sure that we can meet Fire, that's the, you know, Fire Code. I think that is
<br /> critical. So, if we move forward with the up or down vote now to work out the conditions prior
<br /> to the next meeting, I think as long as we all work on that in good faith based on what's laid out
<br /> there and those four that Commissioner Clarkson brought forth are in there with the other more
<br /> standard housekeeping kind of conditions, I think that we'd all be in agreement with that.
<br /> Correct me if I'm wrong, Mrs. Imagire.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you. Any other further discussion before we go, move into a vote?
<br /> ANDREWS: Director Yee has his hand up.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Mr. Yee, go ahead.
<br /> EXHIBIT A
<br /> 22
<br />
|