|
YEE: Can you hear me? So, yes, you could go ahead and vote for approval, and we can monkey
<br /> with the conditions by next month, but I prefer that we just go for a continuance. Let's work on
<br /> the conditions and bring it back next month. That would be more acceptable to me given that
<br /> this was an unfavorable on my part, I'd like the time to be able to make sure we're sitting down
<br /> with the staff to craft all those conditions and not try to make it all up on the fly so you all see
<br /> what they are, the Applicant sees what they are, and we come in with an agreement hopefully at
<br /> the next meeting that you can then approve, the permit. It is based on good faith and given this
<br /> conversation, I would proceed with that good faith to do so, but that's my recommendation. Jeff,
<br /> I see Jeff's hand up.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Jeff, go ahead.
<br /> DARROW: Just a thought. I know there's been, I know concern of Commissioner Clarkson is
<br /> that if we come back "—"vote again for final findings, my understanding, and Malia can chime
<br /> in on this is, we prepared a findings of fact for the denial recommendation with the
<br /> understanding that we may end up going to some sort of legal proceeding. In cases like this in
<br /> the past where we've "—"our recommendation, we just come back with the Commission with a
<br /> revised Background and Recommendation, and it's just like any other Special Permit that we do.
<br /> So, the Commission gets the revised Background and Recommendation, and at the next meeting,
<br /> they vote on it. If they want to adjust conditions in there, we can on the floor, we can adjust it,
<br /> but once that's done, it's done and approved. Just a thought. My thought is that we don't need
<br /> to be thinking about a findings of fact, conclusions of law, decision and order versus our simple
<br /> Background and Recommendation approval.
<br /> CLARKSON: I'm willing to withdraw my motion on the request of the Director if the
<br /> Applicants are willing to continue and take this matter up after consulting with the Planning
<br /> Department.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Go ahead, Mr. Kern.
<br /> KERN: Thank you. Yeah, I, you know,personally, I feel like we, there's a general meetings of
<br /> the mind here to what we're trying to work with, so I'm okay with doing that and coming back
<br /> with those conditions hashed out as long as it stays within the, you know,the context that we all
<br /> spoke about, I think, I personally don't see a problem with that.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. Mr. Replogle, do you have your hands up?
<br /> REPLOGLE: Yes, agree with—yes, I agree with—am I on mute?
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Yes, now you're muted.
<br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, I agree with what Mr. Darrow said we should "—"it's simple, it's clean.
<br /> We're all on the same page, and worse-case scenario the Imagire's could hang a skeleton in their
<br /> driveway.
<br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. So, Mr. Clarkson, would you want to amend your motion?
<br /> EXHIBIT A
<br /> 23
<br />
|